- #1
- 24,752
- 795
Lash Maitra is a postdoc in Loll's group at Utrecht. Her first paper just posted on arxiv was an eyeopener for me, so here's for sharing if you want:
http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.2117
Can causal dynamical triangulations probe factor-ordering issues?
R L Maitra
12 pages
(Submitted on 12 Oct 2009)
"The causal dynamical triangulations (CDT) program has for the first time allowed for path-integral computation of correlation functions in full general relativity without symmetry reductions and taking into account Lorentzian signature. One of the most exciting recent results in CDT is the strong agreement of these computations with (minisuperspace) path integral calculations in quantum cosmology. Herein I will describe my current project to compute minisuperspace (Friedman-Robertson-Walker) path integrals with a range of different measures corresponding to various factor orderings of the Friedman-Robertson-Walker Hamiltonian. The aim is to compare with CDT results and ask whether CDT can shed light on factor-ordering ambiguities in quantum cosmology models."
This was the paper Lash Maitra presented at the June 2009 Zakopane school. It opens a new avenue of investigation. Maybe it was an obvious direction to go (at least after somebody showed you) or maybe it was, say, Loll's vision and she pointed RLM down that road, or maybe Lash Maitra got the idea. It doesn't matter. To my knowledge this paper is the first step on a potentially important path.
"Superspace" is jargon for the space of spatial geometries, so a classical evolution of the universe is a path thru superspace. A wiggly walk thru all the possible configurations of geometry and matter. Guided, most likely, by the Einstein GR equation or something like it.
You could say what Ashtekar's group at Penn State has been doing is quantum cosmology using a "Minisuperspaces" these being simplifications of the grand complete range of geometries obtained by requiring various degrees of uniformity. Symmetry-reduced.
This is what the FRW model is---Friedman Robertson Walker. You get it by assuming isotropic homogeneous. But there are other less drastic simplifications where isotropy is relaxed (like Bianchi I) or homogeneity is relaxed. The Penn State group have papers on those too---maybe one should say "midisuperspace". Anyway the initial simplifications of quantum cosmology are being gradually relaxed, essentially by introducing more parameters.
Lash Maitra points out that there are factor ordering issues that come up in quantizing FRW cosmology.
Loll's CDT approach, on the other hand, doesn't use a minisuperspace. It approximates the whole superspace by a special subset consisting of piecewise flat or triangulated geometries. Which are required to be joined sequentially in a way that makes causality explicit and which makes a path. Many paths can be generated and summed, to perform path integral or sum-over-histories analysis, allowing measurements of geometric quantities to be made along the way.
What the Lash Maitra paper proposes is to use these two approaches to illuminate each other. In particular to see if the CDT path integral can help resolve issues of factor ordering issues in FRW quantum cosmology.
So she cites work by Franz Hinterleitner, who was formerly at Penn State, now Assoc. Prof. at Masaryk U in Brno, Czech. Refers a lot to a 2006 Steigl-Hinterleitner paper. You could see this as the cross-over between the Loll and Ashtekar programs. I was curious so I got the Steigl-Hinterleitner URL.
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0511149
http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.2117
Can causal dynamical triangulations probe factor-ordering issues?
R L Maitra
12 pages
(Submitted on 12 Oct 2009)
"The causal dynamical triangulations (CDT) program has for the first time allowed for path-integral computation of correlation functions in full general relativity without symmetry reductions and taking into account Lorentzian signature. One of the most exciting recent results in CDT is the strong agreement of these computations with (minisuperspace) path integral calculations in quantum cosmology. Herein I will describe my current project to compute minisuperspace (Friedman-Robertson-Walker) path integrals with a range of different measures corresponding to various factor orderings of the Friedman-Robertson-Walker Hamiltonian. The aim is to compare with CDT results and ask whether CDT can shed light on factor-ordering ambiguities in quantum cosmology models."
This was the paper Lash Maitra presented at the June 2009 Zakopane school. It opens a new avenue of investigation. Maybe it was an obvious direction to go (at least after somebody showed you) or maybe it was, say, Loll's vision and she pointed RLM down that road, or maybe Lash Maitra got the idea. It doesn't matter. To my knowledge this paper is the first step on a potentially important path.
"Superspace" is jargon for the space of spatial geometries, so a classical evolution of the universe is a path thru superspace. A wiggly walk thru all the possible configurations of geometry and matter. Guided, most likely, by the Einstein GR equation or something like it.
You could say what Ashtekar's group at Penn State has been doing is quantum cosmology using a "Minisuperspaces" these being simplifications of the grand complete range of geometries obtained by requiring various degrees of uniformity. Symmetry-reduced.
This is what the FRW model is---Friedman Robertson Walker. You get it by assuming isotropic homogeneous. But there are other less drastic simplifications where isotropy is relaxed (like Bianchi I) or homogeneity is relaxed. The Penn State group have papers on those too---maybe one should say "midisuperspace". Anyway the initial simplifications of quantum cosmology are being gradually relaxed, essentially by introducing more parameters.
Lash Maitra points out that there are factor ordering issues that come up in quantizing FRW cosmology.
Loll's CDT approach, on the other hand, doesn't use a minisuperspace. It approximates the whole superspace by a special subset consisting of piecewise flat or triangulated geometries. Which are required to be joined sequentially in a way that makes causality explicit and which makes a path. Many paths can be generated and summed, to perform path integral or sum-over-histories analysis, allowing measurements of geometric quantities to be made along the way.
What the Lash Maitra paper proposes is to use these two approaches to illuminate each other. In particular to see if the CDT path integral can help resolve issues of factor ordering issues in FRW quantum cosmology.
So she cites work by Franz Hinterleitner, who was formerly at Penn State, now Assoc. Prof. at Masaryk U in Brno, Czech. Refers a lot to a 2006 Steigl-Hinterleitner paper. You could see this as the cross-over between the Loll and Ashtekar programs. I was curious so I got the Steigl-Hinterleitner URL.
http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0511149
Last edited: