Radiation from a phone mast vs from a phone

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wokinglad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion compares radiation levels from mobile phone masts and mobile phones. Measurements indicate that at 2cm from a phone, the radiation level is 400V/m, while at 50m from a phone mast, it is only 0.6V/m. The conversation highlights that while phone mast radiation is significantly lower than that from a phone, the safety of these frequencies is contingent upon power levels and specific frequency ranges, which can be similar to those of microwave ovens. The consensus suggests that exposure to low-intensity microwave radiation, such as that from phone masts, is unlikely to pose significant health risks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic radiation and its measurement units (V/m)
  • Familiarity with mobile communication frequencies and their classifications
  • Knowledge of microwave radiation standards and safety limits
  • Awareness of health risk assessments related to radiation exposure
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specific health regulations regarding electromagnetic radiation exposure in your country
  • Learn about the differences between various cellular frequency bands, particularly in relation to microwave frequencies
  • Investigate the long-term health studies related to low-intensity microwave radiation exposure
  • Explore the guidelines set by organizations like the British Standards Institute on microwave leakage and safety
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for health professionals, environmental scientists, and individuals concerned about the safety of living near mobile phone masts or using mobile phones regularly.

Wokinglad
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys

I'm not going ask is radiation from phones and masts safe, half would say it's absolutely safe and half would say it's probably a bit dangerous.

My question is how does phone mast radiation compare to mobile phone radiation, broadly speaking of course. I'm moving house soon and there's a mast about 20m away (similar height to my house) and another about 50m away. How would this radiation compare to a phone (not in a call but when switched on) or WiFi radiation? Now I am aware there'll be many factors involved here such as the power and direction of the mast and so on, so I am asking for a guesstimate. Cheers
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Impossible to say. Phone masts don't always transmit equally in all directions. Most countries have regulations on exposure in nearby properties.
 
Wokinglad said:
So it's like being near a leaky microwave 24/7
Different frequencies, though.
 
berkeman said:
Different frequencies, though.

So the mast frequencies are safer?
 
Wokinglad said:
So the mast frequencies are safer?

not necessarily, depends on power levels. Also, many cellular frequencies are very close to the microwave oven frequency of 2.45 GHz
For example, here is the Australian cellular bands...

upload_2017-4-17_8-56-36.png
Dave
 
Wokinglad said:
So it's like being near a leaky microwave 24/7 :nb)
No, a normal microwave.
I'm not going ask is radiation from phones and masts safe, half would say it's absolutely safe and half would say it's probably a bit dangerous.
Not in this forum they wouldn't. But if you ask a group of people somewhere and half say it's dangerous, you're asking the wrong group!
 
Wokinglad said:
So it's like being near a leaky microwave 24/7 :nb)

russ_watters said:
No, a normal microwave.

To expand a bit on Russ's post:
Note that the linked article states that the microwave is "leaking at the British Standards Institute limit".
So the 0.5 V/m is the maximum allowable leakage from a microwave according to these standards. In other words, this is the maximum leakage that is still considered safe for a consumer to use. That doesn't mean that higher amounts are dangerous though. We tend to err on the side of caution in situations like this. If exposure to low intensity microwave radiation is dangerous, then the effects must be very subtle, as we don't see any obvious damage in the short term and the long term effects must be small enough that they are buried within the noise from thousands of other health hazards you face every day.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K