Radiation heat transfer between air or wall

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the modes of heat transfer involving a hot object placed in a chamber with walls and surrounding air at different temperatures. Participants explore the contributions of convection and radiation to the heat transfer rate, questioning how to properly account for radiation between the object, the walls, and the air.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the heat transfer rate can be expressed as q = q(conv) + q(rad), questioning whether radiation occurs between the object and the walls or the surrounding air.
  • Another participant presents a formula for the rate of energy radiation from the object, suggesting that it receives heat radiation from both the walls and the air, leading to a net heat transfer equation.
  • A later reply asserts that the air does not significantly affect radiative heat transfer between the object and the walls, indicating that the air's properties primarily influence convection.
  • Participants discuss the insignificance of radiation between the air and the object compared to radiation between the object and the walls.
  • One participant raises a question about calculating heat transfer rates between two walls with an air gap, proposing two different equations and questioning the treatment of the convective heat transfer coefficient.
  • Another participant challenges the approach of adding heat flux values from convection, arguing that it does not accurately represent the energy transfer process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of radiation between the air and the object, with some asserting it is negligible while others acknowledge its existence. The discussion on the heat transfer rate between two walls also reveals uncertainty regarding the correct formulation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with the mathematical formulations presented, including the possibility of negative values in the radiation equation, and the need to clarify assumptions about the contributions of different heat transfer mechanisms.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying heat transfer principles, particularly in contexts involving multiple modes of heat transfer and the interactions between different materials and mediums.

zenite
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Lets say a hot object is at 500K and placed in a chamber with wall temperature of 300K. The surrounding air in the chamber is 320K.

So what is the mode of heat transfer for the hot objection? There is convection and radiation. so the heat transfer rate, q = q(conv) + q(rad), right?

Convection is between object and surrounding air. But what about radiation? Is it between the object and the chamber walls or is it between the object and the surrounding air? Depending on which is chosen, the q(rad) will varies since q(rad) depends on the temperature difference of the 2 body.

Can anyone help me out? I am confused on using 500K and 300K to calculate q(rad) or 500K and 320K.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Ok, I think I got it. Please correct me if I am wrong.

Rate of energy radiation of an object (T is given by
qo = A\sigma\epsilonT4

If the object is in a chamber with wall temperature of Tw and surrounding air of Ta, then the object receives heat radiation from both wall and air.
qwall to object = A\sigma\epsilonTw4

qair to object = A\sigma\epsilonTa4

Hence, the net q for object to air and wall is:
qnet = A\sigma\epsilon(T4-Ta4-Tw4)

ps: the sigma and epsilon isn't suppose to be superscript, not sure why it turns out this way
 
Hi zenite, welcome to PF. The air isn't going to participate to any significant effect in the heat transfer between the object and the wall. (Another way of looking at this is that a few meters of air won't block radiative heat transfer, just as a few meters of air doesn't attenuate visible light to any noticeable degree). The air properties are only going to affect the convection term.
 
Ok, so radiation takes place between the object and the walls only? Is there no radiation taking place between the air and the object or is it insignificant as compared to the other modes of heat transfer?

And yes, I realized that the formula that I put up earlier on is incorrect, since taking T4 - Ta4 - Tw4 can give a negative value, which is illogical if T>Ta>Tw.
 
zenite said:
Ok, so radiation takes place between the object and the walls only? Is there no radiation taking place between the air and the object or is it insignificant as compared to the other modes of heat transfer?

It exists but is insignificant.
 
Oh thanks for clearing my doubts. I have another question on convection.

If an air gap exists between 2 walls, say, wall A and wall B. the convective heat transfer coefficient of the air is h. Assuming no radiation and conduction in the air gap, what is the heat transfer rate between the 2 walls?

Let Ta be temperature of wall A, Tb of wall B and Tair of the air.

q = hA (Ta - Tair) + hA (Tair - Tb) = hA (Ta - Tb)
or is it...
q = 0.5hA (Ta - Tb)

Since convection takes place 'twice', between wall A and air, and between wall B and air, should the h be multiply by 0.5?
 
Last edited:
I don't think this approach is going to prove fruitful. Convection removes heat energy by fluid motion tangential to a surface. The convective flow isn't going to automatically divert to the other wall and deposit heat energy there. And I don't see the sense in adding the heat flux values together. Assuming that convection does dominate in this problem (which isn't clear), it's the same flux of energy; adding the values is nonsensical.

The general approach is to calculate the values of heat flux by each mechanism (conduction, convection, radiation) and determine if one or more can be assumed negligible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K