Radiative collapse of an electron in a classical atom

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy radiated by an electron during one revolution in a classical atom, specifically using the Larmor Formula to estimate energy loss. Participants explore the implications of energy loss on atomic stability and the validity of their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about using the chain rule to find the energy radiated during one revolution, referencing the Larmor Formula for energy radiation rate.
  • Another participant suggests calculating the time of a classical revolution and multiplying the energy loss per time by that time, noting that if the energy loss is significant, a differential equation approach may be necessary.
  • A participant estimates the overall energy of the electron and compares it to the energy lost per revolution, concluding that the approach is valid if the energy loss is small.
  • Concerns are raised by another participant regarding the stability of atoms, questioning the initial estimate of energy loss being much smaller than the overall energy, suggesting that this could imply atoms are stable for much longer than expected.
  • Further clarification is provided about the time scale for an electron falling onto the nucleus, with one participant indicating they will double-check their calculations regarding energy loss.
  • Another participant provides a calculation of energy loss per revolution, suggesting it is small enough to justify the initial approximation, but challenges the earlier claim of it being 1030 times smaller.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the magnitude of energy loss relative to the overall energy of the electron, with some asserting that the initial estimates may lead to incorrect conclusions about atomic stability. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the accuracy of these estimates and their implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the dependence of their calculations on assumptions about energy loss and the time scale of electron orbits, indicating that the results may vary based on these factors.

LauritsT
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello!

How do I find how much energy does electron radiate during one revolution if the energy radiation rate is given by Larmor Formula: dE /dt = [(− 2/3)* e2* a2]/ c3. Should I use the chain rule? At the moment I only want a hint how to solve this.

With best regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can find the time of a classical revolution and multiply the energy loss per time by that time. Then compare the result to the overall energy. If it is small the approach works, if it is large then dE/dt will change during the orbit and you cannot use this simple approach. Then you have to solve a differential equation as a depends on t now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LauritsT
mfb said:
You can find the time of a classical revolution and multiply the energy loss per time by that time. Then compare the result to the overall energy. If it is small the approach works, if it is large then dE/dt will change during the orbit and you cannot use this simple approach. Then you have to solve a differential equation as a depends on t now.

Thanks! So very roughly speaking, the overallenergy that the electron should have is K~ e2 and the energy lost per revolution is E~ e5 / (m3/2 * r * c3). So since the energy lost per revolution is much smaller (~1030 times smaller) then the approach works. In the case when dE/dt is large: the differential equation already has t as a variable as I understand, since dE=...dt, yes?
 
Yes, you'll get ##dE=c (a(t))^2 dt## with some constant c - but you don't know a(t), so you probably want to rewrite that as ##dE=c (a(E))^2 dt##, plug in a(E) and then solve for E(t). But with a small energy loss, that is not necessary.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LauritsT
LauritsT said:
So since the energy lost per revolution is much smaller (~1030 times smaller)

That doesn't sound right to me. This leads to atoms stable for thousands of years, when I thought it was well under a microsecond.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LauritsT
Vanadium 50 said:
That doesn't sound right to me. This leads to atoms stable for thousands of years, when I thought it was well under a microsecond.

Thanks for the tip! I've read also that electron should fall onto the nucleus in 10-11 seconds. But since it the energy of only one full rotation with respect to the whole energy (kinetic) then I didn't think of it as a fault right away. I will check it once more.

//edit: just to be clear my result was before dE/K = 10-30 where dE is energy lost in one revolution and K is kinetic energy. But once again, I will check my calculations
 
I get nW, or 10 GeV/s. At a few PHz classical revolution frequency, this is a few µeV per revolution. Not 1030 times smaller, but still small enough to make the initial approximation reasonable.
Calculated for a distance of 1 Ångström.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LauritsT

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K