Radicals Within Radicals: Simplifying and Solving Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter ExamFever
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radicals
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves simplifying the expression sqrt(7 + 2sqrt(6)) - sqrt(7 - 2sqrt(6)). It focuses on the manipulation of radicals and the algebraic techniques required to solve equations involving them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to square both sides of the equation to eliminate the radicals, leading to further algebraic manipulation. Some participants question the complexity of the approach and suggest simplifying the left side using properties of radicals. Others raise concerns about the positivity of the original expression and the implications for the solutions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights into the algebraic process and questioning the assumptions made by the original poster. There is a recognition of the need for clarity in the steps taken, and some guidance has been provided regarding the properties of radicals and the positivity of the expressions involved.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses a desire to solve the problem without the use of a calculator, indicating a constraint on the methods they wish to employ. There is also a mention of time constraints affecting their ability to practice and understand the material more deeply.

ExamFever
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



sqrt(7 + 2sqrt(6)) - sqrt(7 - 2sqrt(6))

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



In order to work out the radicals, I define the answer as "x". Now I can square both sides to get rid of some of the first radicals:

sqrt(7 + 2sqrt(6)) - sqrt(7 - 2sqrt(6)) = x
(sqrt(7 + 2sqrt(6)) - sqrt(7 - 2sqrt(6)))2 = (x)2

Now, I hope this is the right way of starting on this problem, continuing we get:

(7 + 2sqrt(6)) - 2 * sqrt(7+ 2 sqrt(6)) * sqrt(7 - 2 sqrt(6)) + (7 - 2 sqrt(6))

this implies:

14 - 2 * sqrt(7+ 2 sqrt(6)) * sqrt(7 - 2 sqrt(6)) = x2

on moving the 14 to the RHS and squaring once more to get rid of more radicals:

(-2 * sqrt(7+ 2 sqrt(6)) * sqrt(7 - 2 sqrt(6)) )2 = (x2-14)2

this implies

4 * (7 + 2 sqrt(6)) * (7 - 2 sqrt(6)) = (x2-14)2

because the two factors with sqrts are conjugate pairs, the LHS will look like this:

4 * (72 - (4*6) = 4 * 25 = 100

thus

100 = (x2-14)2

by taking the square root of both sides:

±10 = ± (x2-14)
±10±14 = ± x2

Now, this does not look like a proper solution. Working further I can get a couple of answers for x, but no way to check them or anything:

sqrt(24) = 2 sqrt(6) = ± x
sqrt(4) = 2 = ± x

Where do I go wrong?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can check the answer by using a calculator on the original problem line. In fact, you can use a calculator to check each line of your solution...
 
Yes, however, the problem states I should be able to calculate without the use of a calculator...
 
Sure, I'm just saying that you can use a calculator to see if what you are doing algebraically is working...
 
ExamFever said:
sqrt(7 + 2sqrt(6)) - sqrt(7 - 2sqrt(6)) = x
(sqrt(7 + 2sqrt(6)) - sqrt(7 - 2sqrt(6)))2 = (x)2

Now, I hope this is the right way of starting on this problem, continuing we get:

(7 + 2sqrt(6)) - 2 * sqrt(7+ 2 sqrt(6)) * sqrt(7 - 2 sqrt(6)) + (7 - 2 sqrt(6))

this implies:

14 - 2 * sqrt(7+ 2 sqrt(6)) * sqrt(7 - 2 sqrt(6)) = x2

on moving the 14 to the RHS and squaring once more to get rid of more radicals:
Why do you make it so complicated? Simplify the left side, using that

\sqrt{7+ 2 \sqrt6} \sqrt{7 - 2 \sqrt6} =\sqrt{(7+ 2 \sqrt6) (7 - 2 \sqrt6)}=?

As for the sign of x, 7+2sqrt(6)>7-2sqrt(6), and so are the square roots. The difference is positive.

ehild
 
ExamFever said:
but no way to check them or anything:

sqrt(24) = 2 sqrt(6) = ± x
sqrt(4) = 2 = ± x
Why do you think there is no way to check? Isn't it obvious the original number is positive? And it's pretty easy to show that it's less than 4 too.

Sometimes separating the solutions via inequalities requires a lot of precision, but this one only requires very coarse estimates.

P.S. it's probably better to split into cases, rather than using ±; it's easier to avoid making mistakes that way.
 
Thanks to all of you. When I read your answers everything becomes clear to me. The only thing I do not understand sometimes is how I could be so stupid not to see it...I paid special attention to seeing the rules for radicals in here but missed the simple fact at one point that sqrt(a) * sqrt(b) = sqrt(ab)

I would practice more on my own not to ask so many seemingly stupid questions. Unfortunately I have very little time left and I need to evolve my basic understandings into a (somewhat) more advanced understanding of the basic rules.

Just want to say I really appreciate the input and patience. Feels like I found a great place to get help with math...sometime the internet is too big to find something like that, not this time luckily :)

Cheers,
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K