Radioactive decay question, how to do it?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of radioactive decay, specifically involving Uranium-238 (238 92U) and Lead-206 (206 82Pb). The half-life of 238 92U is established as 4.5 × 109 years, with an initial rock sample containing 3.0 × 1022 atoms of 238 92U and no 206 82Pb. At a certain time, the sample contains twice as many 238 92U atoms as 206 82Pb atoms, leading to the equation u/(3 × 1022 - u) = 2, where u represents the number of uranium atoms. The manipulation of the half-life equation and the decay constant calculation are crucial for deriving the number of uranium atoms at that time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radioactive decay principles
  • Familiarity with half-life calculations
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their applications in decay equations
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the radioactive decay equation N = N0e-yt
  • Learn about the decay series and its implications in geology
  • Explore the concept of decay constants and their calculation
  • Investigate graphical representations of radioactive decay over time
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or geology, educators teaching radioactive decay concepts, and professionals involved in radiometric dating or nuclear science.

Tangeton
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
1. The half-life of 238 92U is 4.5 × 109 years, which is much larger than all the other half-lives of the decays in the series. A rock sample when formed originally contained 3.0 × 1022 atoms of 238 92U and no 206 82Pb atoms. At any given time most of the atoms are either 238 92U or 206 82Pb with a negligible number of atoms in other forms in the decay series.

(ii) A certain time, t, after its formation the sample contained twice as many 238 92U atoms as 206, 82 Pb atoms. Show that the number of 238, 92 U atoms in the rock sample at time t was 2.0 × 1022.

The answer shows an equation u/(3 x1022 - u) = 2
(u represents the number of uranium atoms then)

How did they get this equation? What kind of way of thinking got them to this point... don't get it. If someone could explain please. Also, if it helps, there was also part (i) where the task was to show how the number of 238 92U atoms and the number of 206 82Pb atoms in the rock sample vary over a period of 1.0 × 1010 years from its formation using a graph of N against time t.

Maybe I should add more to be up with the forum rules... I want to use N=N0e-yt and worked out the decay constant y to be ln(2)/Half life of U = ln(2)/4.5x109 = 1.54x10-10.

Question 2 in the paper: http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects/AQA-PHYA5-1-QP-JUN12.PDF
Mark scheme: http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects/AQA-PHYA52A-W-MS-JUN12.PDF
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Tangeton said:
1. The half-life of 238 92U is 4.5 × 109 years, which is much larger than all the other half-lives of the decays in the series. A rock sample when formed originally contained 3.0 × 1022 atoms of 238 92U and no 206 82Pb atoms. At any given time most of the atoms are either 238 92U or 206 82Pb with a negligible number of atoms in other forms in the decay series.

(ii) A certain time, t, after its formation the sample contained twice as many 238 92U atoms as 206, 82 Pb atoms. Show that the number of 238, 92 U atoms in the rock sample at time t was 2.0 × 1022.

The answer shows an equation u/(3 x1022 - u) = 2
(u represents the number of uranium atoms then)

How did they get this equation? What kind of way of thinking got them to this point... don't get it. If someone could explain please. Also, if it helps, there was also part (i) where the task was to show how the number of 238 92U atoms and the number of 206 82Pb atoms in the rock sample vary over a period of 1.0 × 1010 years from its formation using a graph of N against time t.

Maybe I should add more to be up with the forum rules... I want to use N=N0e-yt and worked out the decay constant y to be ln(2)/Half life of U = ln(2)/4.5x109 = 1.54x10-10.

Question 2 in the paper: http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects/AQA-PHYA5-1-QP-JUN12.PDF
Mark scheme: http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects/AQA-PHYA52A-W-MS-JUN12.PDF

It's pretty clear that a manipulation of the half-life equation is in order. Here is another discussion of this equation:

http://lpc1.clpccd.cc.ca.us/lpc/hanna/HistoricalGeology/HalfLifeEquations.pdf
 
SteamKing said:
It's pretty clear that a manipulation of the half-life equation is in order. Here is another discussion of this equation:

http://lpc1.clpccd.cc.ca.us/lpc/hanna/HistoricalGeology/HalfLifeEquations.pdf

Thank you my teacher didn't even give me that equation but it was very useful. This is my working...
t = Half life * log2(1/y) = 4.5 x109log2(3/2) = 2632331253
so now N = N0e-1.54x10-10x 2632331253 = 2.0 x1022 (2sf)

Very useful and definitely better than the answer they given but still don't know how they got that equation... anyone?
 
Hi. The numbers involved and the description makes all of this look more complicated than the question really is. So, to simplify:
You have a number N of particles A to begin; these can either stay as A or change into B.
Question: if at time t you have twice as many A than you have B, how many A do you have?
n(A) + n(B) = u + Pb = N = 3.0 × 1022, at any time.
at t: u + u/2 = N, so u = 2N/3.
Also from the equation above you can take u to the right of the equal sign and obtain:
u/2 = N–u
-> u/(N–u) = 2.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K