Radiowaves and potential harm? Intensity?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jlyu002@ucr.e
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intensity Potential
jlyu002@ucr.e
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
I understand that radio waves have very low frequency, which means it is not ionizing as gamma and ultraviolet are, but while browsing the web, it seems that there are mixed point of views on its potential hazard to human health.

Hmm, if it is dangerous, why? Does it have to do with intensity? What does intensity really mean? Does Intensity mean there are many radio waves focused at a single point?

Can we impose light waves onto each other?

Sorry for the bombardment of questions and thank you in advance PhysicsForums Community!
 
on Phys.org
Yes, radio waves are electromagnetic radiation at the low frequency end of the whole range of EM and yes it is not ionizing radiation.
Above the radio range are microwave, infrared, and visible light, also none of which pose any radiation hazard.
UV just above visible light (UVA) also is not a hazard, but the higher frequencies are a risk, (UVB is fairly low risk unless exposure is prolonged, UVC a higher risk).
Above that are X rays and gamma rays which can be seriously hazardous, although X-rays are of course used routinely for medical diagnosis.
While the risk is there, the exposure is almost instantaneous and is not long enough for serious damage to be likely.
Gamma rays you do not want to be anywhere near, (like near a nuclear detonation for example).

While lower frequency EM is non-ionizing, a powerful source nearby can heat things up.
Standing too close to a fire (red/infra red) could burn you, but would not induce the kind of symptoms associated with 'radiation sickness'

There is a special case for microwaves at the frequency used for ovens.
These still are not ionizing, but are very efficient at heating up anything containing water.
Because of that they are well shielded and there is also a safety mechanism which prevent it from operating when the door is open and somebody could put their hands in.
However that risk is still just down to burning/scalding injury..
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jlyu002@ucr.e
rootone said:
Above the radio range are microwave,

just so the OP @jlyu002@ucr.e doesn't have any misunderstandings
Microwave EM is/are still radio wavesDave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jlyu002@ucr.e
rootone said:
Gamma rays you do not want to be anywhere near, (like near a nuclear detonation for example).

I have a bunch of good gamma emitters at home ... makes the Geiger counter click really well :wink:Dave
 
rootone said:
Gamma rays you do not want to be anywhere near, (like near a nuclear detonation for example).
We are exposed to natural gamma radiation all the time. It's a matter of dose, nuclear explosions lead to a huge dose while the natural background radiation does not.
jlyu002@ucr.e said:
Does Intensity mean there are many radio waves focused at a single point?
You cannot focus waves to regions significantly smaller than their wavelengths (there are a few exceptions but those are not relevant here). Focusing waves to a smaller region increases their intensity, yes.
Unless you are directly next to a powerful radio emitter (like climbing up the antenna), they won't heat anything in dangerous ways.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jlyu002@ucr.e

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K