MHB Radius Small Circle: Measurement & More

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Radius
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the radius of a small circle inscribed within a square with a side length of 2. Using the Pythagorean theorem, the relationship between the radius (x) and the square's dimensions is established through the equation (1-x)² + 1 = (1+x)². Solving this equation reveals that the radius x equals 1/4. The solution is confirmed as correct and well-received by participants. The mathematical approach effectively demonstrates the application of Pythagorean theorem in geometric contexts.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0

Attachments

  • radius of small circle.jpg
    radius of small circle.jpg
    25.8 KB · Views: 99
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[sp]Let suppose that the side of the square is 2. In this case, if x is the radius of the 'small circle', for the theorem of Pythagoras it must be...

$\displaystyle (1-x)^{2} + 1 = (1+x)^{2}$

... so that is $\displaystyle x = \frac{1}{4}$...[/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
hint:
see Ford Circles
 
chisigma said:
[sp]Let suppose that the side of the square is 2. In this case, if x is the radius of the 'small circle', for the theorem of Pythagoras it must be...

$\displaystyle (1-x)^{2} + 1 = (1+x)^{2}$

... so that is $\displaystyle x = \frac{1}{4}$...[/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
very good solution !
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top