Is My Railgun Defying the Laws of Physics?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a homemade railgun constructed with two ring stand poles, a steel ball, and a car battery, which is reportedly firing in the opposite direction than expected. The user experiences a maximum velocity of 5 cm/sec and questions the physics behind the observed behavior. Participants suggest that the unexpected direction may stem from an odd number of sign errors in the setup or the geometry affecting the electromagnetic force acting on the ball, leading to torque that causes the ball to roll towards the user instead of away.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic principles, specifically the Lorentz force.
  • Familiarity with the right-hand rule in electromagnetism.
  • Basic knowledge of torque and rotational motion.
  • Experience with circuit design and safety precautions when using car batteries.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Lorentz force and its applications in railgun design.
  • Learn about torque calculations and their implications in electromagnetic systems.
  • Explore the right-hand rule and its significance in determining force direction in electromagnetism.
  • Investigate the effects of the Faraday cage phenomenon in conductive materials.
USEFUL FOR

Electronics enthusiasts, physics students, and hobbyists interested in electromagnetic devices and railgun mechanics.

Cbixel
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I just made a rail gun using two ring stand poles, a steel ball, and a car battery. Maximum velocity is about 5 cm/sec.

What is strange is that it is shooting the wrong way. Defying the laws of physics and right hand rule. Any ideas ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do we know that is "defying" the laws?
You don't bother to give any details.
 
Cbixel said:
What is strange is that it is shooting the wrong way. Defying the laws of physics and right hand rule. Any ideas ?

Usually this happens because you've made an odd number of sign errors. Professional scientists and engineers have gone through years of formal training to ensure that they know to always make an even number of sign errors. (Note that making zero errors is a special case of making an even number of errors, and is generally considered to represent an unrealistic and unnecessary ideal).

OK, kidding, aside... You'll have to tell us a lot more about your setup before we'll be able to tell you why your getting the result you're observing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cosmik debris and Bystander
5cm/sec ?
 
I would definitely like to see that setup. The only thing I can imagine is that you put the ring poles in parallel to create the rail. But what creates the force on the ball?

Also, yeah, 5cm/s? That's 0.18km/h. Are you sure your rail isn't just not completely level and the ball just rolls due to gravity?
 
So, its pretty level. The ball will not roll without a current applied. If I give it a push either direction, it rolls about the same distance before stopping, so its reasonably level.

So, the right hand rule says the force should be away from me. I am at the end of the two rails that is attached to the battery, so:
  • The current goes out the right rail (mag field up between rails).
  • The current comes back on the left rail. (mag field up between rails)
  • Current through steel ball is from right rail to left rail.
  • Right Hand Rule (Current from right to left through ball, plus mag field up = force away from me)
Switching the direction of current in the whole system should not have any effect, as both mag field and current through ball change directions, so force should still be away from me.

Perhaps I have created a left handed rail gun...

Anyway, if I put a small wire across the two rails, the wire moves away from me as would be expected. I am looking at torques on the the ball...
 
What is limiting the current from the car battery? You're not shorting it out, are you? That can be pretty dangerous...
 
I think that a force acting away from you can result in the ball rolling towards you.
 
The cause for that above behavior is very different though. If the spool didn't have that footstand to keep it a centimeter off the paper, the effect wouldn't happen.
 
  • #10
I am not saying that this is the case here. I have no idea of the geometry or about where the electromagnetic force acts, relative to the supporting surfaces.
Just a possibility.
I was thinking about a situation with the resultant of the electromagnetic force acting somewhere below the line of contact between the ball and the supporting edges. If there are any edges.
 
  • #11
I think I have it figured out. The force is, in fact, in the expected direction, or away from me. But, because the ball is between two rails, the axis of rotation is at the elevation of the points of contact between the ball and the rails. Thus, the force, away from me, is acting below the axis of rotation and creating a torque that spins the bottom of the ball away from me and the ball rolls toward me. This is different than the string on the spool demonstration, where the force is above the axis of rotation.

To test this theory out, we placed two tables 6 inches apart, and placed a bowling ball in the gap. A piece of tape attached onto the bottom of the ball and pulled toward us horizontally did, in fact, roll the ball away from us.
 
  • #12
Also, we think the majority of the current must be conducting over the bottom surface of the ball, and thus, this is where the Lorentz force is acting.

I am just glad I did not accidentally create the first "left handed railgun" ever.
 
  • #13
Mightn't you be dealing with the Faraday cage effect since you are using a metal ball?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 112 ·
4
Replies
112
Views
22K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K