I Random variable vs Random Process

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between random variables and random processes, emphasizing that each coin flip in a sequence is treated as a separate random variable due to their independence. It highlights that random processes are typically defined as indexed collections of random variables, often over time, rather than across different spatial locations. The conversation also notes that while random variables can share the same probability distribution, they remain distinct if they represent different outcomes. Additionally, the definition of a stochastic process can extend to include spatial dimensions, contradicting the notion that they are solely time-based. Overall, the thread reinforces the importance of understanding the context and indexing when discussing random variables and processes.
fog37
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
108
TL;DR Summary
Difference between random variable and random process
Hello,

When flipping a fair coin 4 times, the two possible outcomes for each flip are either H or T with the same probability ##P(H)=P(T)=0.5##.

Why are the 4 outcomes to be considered as the realizations of 4 different random variables and not as different realizations of the same random variables? A random variable is the outcome (numerical or categorical) of a random experiment. More properly, a random variable is a function that assigns a real number to each outcome of a random experiment.

I guess each coin flip is seen as a separate and independent random experiment so each outcome is therefore associated to different a different random variable...?

A random/stochastic process is generally introduced as a family of time-series where the values of the various time series at the same and specific time instant ##t## are the realization of the SAME random variables...Can a stochastic process be seen as a sequence of random variables and their realizations across different experiments? For example, we can collect the random signal temperature T(t) at 5 different locations to obtain a random process...

Could we define a sequence of coin flips a random process?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect there are multiple reasons for defining it the way it usually is - ie as separate random variables.
Here's just one:
Most random processes have some form of serial dependence, so that the distribution of later outcomes is affected by earlier outcomes. If we had a framework that defined all outcomes as realisations of a single random variable, we could not write a distribution for the random variable, since that distribution would depend on which realisation we were talking about.

fog37 said:
Summary: Difference between random variable and random process

Could we define a sequence of coin flips a random process?
We do. That is the standard definition for that case - a discrete random process in discrete time. Random processes can be discrete or continuous - meaning the outcome variable has a discrete or continuous range - and can occur in discrete or continuous time. Hence we have four different types of random process.
fog37 said:
Summary: Difference between random variable and random process

Can a stochastic process be seen as a sequence of random variables and their realizations across different experiments?
Yes. If it's a sequence then it's in discrete time. But we also have random processes in continuous time, where there is one random variable for each instant in time, arranged as a continuum. Financiers typically model stock prices and interest rates as continuous processes in continuous time.

fog37 said:
Summary: Difference between random variable and random process

For example, we can collect the random signal temperature T(t) at 5 different locations to obtain a random process...
No. Random processes occur across time, not across space, as the use of the word "location" implies. But a set of temperature measurements at five different times in the same place would be a continuous process in discrete time.
 
andrewkirk said:
No. Random processes occur across time, not across space
I'll disagree if the intended meaning of "random process" is "stochastic process". Many books on stochastic processes only deal with random variables indexed by time. However, in general, a stochastic process is an indexed collection of random variables. The index can be something besides a time stamp.

fog37 said:
Why are the 4 outcomes to be considered as the realizations of 4 different random variables and not as different realizations of the same random variables?
The fact you say there are 4 (distinct) outcomes implies you have some way of making the distinction. So, as a matter of applied math, there are 4 different random variables. (If the first and second toss were the same random variable then the outcome of the first toss would always match the outcome of the second toss.) Sometimes people say A and B are "the same" random variable when they only mean that A and B are random variables with the same probability distribution. If you toss one coin 4 times, the first toss is not the second toss. So the two tosses are distinct random variables. If we are assuming the coin is fair then the two random variables have the same probability distribution.
fog37 said:
A random/stochastic process is generally introduced as a family of time-series where the values of the various time series at the same and specific time instant ##t## are the realization of the SAME random variables..

No, The usual situation is that the value of some quantity at different times is considered to be a pair of distinct random variables, not a single random variable. It may be that those two random variables have the same probability distribution.
fog37 said:
.Can a stochastic process be seen as a sequence of random variables and their realizations across different experiments? For example, we can collect the random signal temperature T(t) at 5 different locations to obtain a random process...
Yes. You can find lots of literature on spatial stochastic processes.
 
I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top