Ranking Nucleophiles: Understanding Reactivity and Polarizability

  • Thread starter Thread starter AsuraSky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strength
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on ranking nucleophiles based on their reactivity, specifically analyzing the order: CH3S- > Br- > NH3 > F- > CH3OH. The key takeaway is that CH3S- is a stronger nucleophile than Br- due to its higher charge density and ability to donate electrons more readily, despite Br- being larger and more polarizable. The misconception that larger size correlates with nucleophilicity is clarified, emphasizing that charge and electronegativity play critical roles in determining nucleophile strength.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nucleophilicity and electrophilicity
  • Familiarity with polarizability concepts in chemistry
  • Knowledge of the properties of common nucleophiles such as CH3S-, Br-, NH3, F-, and CH3OH
  • Basic grasp of Lewis structures and electron donation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the factors affecting nucleophilicity in organic chemistry
  • Learn about the role of charge density in determining nucleophile strength
  • Investigate the relationship between atomic size and polarizability
  • Explore examples of nucleophilic substitution reactions and their mechanisms
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and anyone preparing for exams involving nucleophiles and reaction mechanisms will benefit from this discussion.

AsuraSky
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
One the practice problems i was doing in preparation for my exam was to rank the following nucleophiles in the order of decreasing reactivity, best nucleophile first.

Nucleophiles: CH3OH, Br-, NH3, F-, CH3S-

The answer was CH3S->Br->NH3>F->CH3OH

What I don't understand is why CH3S- is a stronger nucleophile than the bromide ion, shouldn't bromide be stronger because it's a bigger atom and thus have more polarizability?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
You sure it is a good row? It seems that amonia should be a better nucleophile than Br-?
 
I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
22K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
10K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
11K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
11K