Ratio between molecules having different speeds

  • Thread starter Thread starter DavideGenoa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Molecules Ratio
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the ratio of molecules with escape speed, denoted as ##N_{v_{\text{e}}}##, to those at root mean square speed, ##N_{v_{\text{rms}}}##, specifically for nitrogen at a height of 150 km and a temperature of 1000 K. The relevant equations include the escape speed ##v_{\text{e}}=\sqrt{(2G M_t)/r}## and the root mean square speed ##v_{\text{rms}}=\sqrt{(3RT)/M}##. Participants suggest using the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution to derive the ratio, emphasizing the need to integrate the distribution function from ##v_{\text{e}}## to infinity for accurate results. The calculations yield a significant discrepancy between the computed value and the expected result from the textbook, indicating potential errors in the source material.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of molecular speeds
  • Knowledge of escape velocity and root mean square speed calculations
  • Familiarity with thermodynamic principles, particularly the ideal gas law
  • Basic calculus for integration of continuous functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution
  • Learn how to compute escape velocity for different celestial bodies
  • Explore the implications of molecular speeds on atmospheric escape
  • Investigate potential sources of error in scientific textbooks and translations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or chemistry, researchers studying atmospheric science, and educators looking to clarify concepts related to molecular speeds and thermodynamics.

DavideGenoa
Messages
151
Reaction score
5
Hi, friends!

1. Homework Statement :

I have found an exercise where one should calculate the ratio ##N_{v_{\text{e}}}/N_{v_{\text{rms}}}## between the number of molecules having escape speed ##v_{\text{e}}=\sqrt{(2G M_t)/r}## (where ##M## is the mass of Earth) and those moving at the root mean square speed ##v_{\text{rms}}=\sqrt{(3RT)/M}## (where ##M## is the molar mass) in the nitrogen found at a height of ##150 \text{ km}## and a temperature of ##1000\text{ K}##.

Homework Equations


I know the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of molecular speeds
##f(v)=4\pi\bigg(\frac{M}{2\pi RT }\bigg)^{\frac{3}{2}}e^{-\frac{M}{2RT}v^2}##​
which means that, if we call ##N## the total number of molecules and ##\Delta n## is the number of molecules having the speed in the interval ##\Delta v##,
##dn=N f(v)dv.##​

The Attempt at a Solution


The values of ##v_{\text{f}}\approx1.1\cdot 10^4\text{ m/s}## and ##v_{\text{qm}}\approx 940\text{ m/s}## are immediately computed, but I have no idea how to find ##N_{v_{\text{e}}}/N_{v_{\text{rms}}}##. I do not know if I can use the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution nor how to use it, since, with such a continuous distribution, the probability that a molecule has a definite velocity, rather than being in an interval, is zero. I am not able to use, if it is useful in this case, the approximation ##\Delta n\approx N f(v)\Delta v##, either.

I ##\infty##-ly thank you all!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you should read the question again and be sure you are stating it correctly. The number moving at ##exactly## ##v_{rms}## is zero. So the ratio you have stated does not make sense.

For example: You could calculate the number with velocity greater than ##v_e## and divide that by the total number. That is, you could get the fraction of the total that is moving fast enough to escape the Earth. That gives you an estimate of the fraction that will escape at this temperature. To get the number with velocity over ##v_e## you integrate ##f(v)## from ##v_e## to infinity.

Or you could compute the ratio of ##f(v)## at ##v_e## to ##f(v)## at ##v_{rms}##. That is, you could compute the ratio of the probability function at the two speeds. Not quite sure how useful such a thing is. But it depends on what the problem statement is actually asking for.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DavideGenoa
The question is as I have written. There might be a printing error, nevertheless.
I had thought that
##\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{n(v_{\text{e}}+h)-n(v_{\text{e}})}{n(v_{\text{rms}+h})-n(v_{\text{rms}})} =\frac{\frac{dn(v_{\text{e}})}{dv}}{\frac{dn(v_{\text{rms}})}{dv}}=\frac{f(v_{\text{e}})}{f(v_{\text{rms}})}=e^{\frac{M}{2RT}(v_{\text{e}}^2-v_{\text{rms}}^2)}##​
But, taking the values given in the appendix of my text into account, I compute
##e^{\frac{M}{2RT}(v_{\text{e}}^2-v_{\text{rms}}^2)}=\exp\big({\frac{2\cdot14.0067\cdot10^{-3}}{2\cdot8.31\cdot1000}\big(\frac{6.670\cdot10^{-11}\cdot5.97\cdot10^{24}}{6.37\cdot 10^6+150000}-\frac{3\cdot8.31\cdot 1000}{2\cdot14.0067\cdot10^{-3}}\big) }\big)\approx 6.67\cdot 10^{88}##​
where ##14.0067\text{ g}## is the molar mass of ##\text{ N}_2##, ##5.97\cdot10^{24}\text{ kg}## is the mass of Earth and ##6.37\cdot 10^6\text{ m}## its radius, but the book's result is ##1\cdot10^{-87}##...
There might well be a printing, or translation (my book is the Italian translation), error...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
891
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
734
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K