Why Do 'Forbidden Zones' Exist in Goldbach Partitions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Paul Mackenzie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    partitions Ratio
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the existence of "forbidden zones" in Goldbach partitions, specifically examining the ratio R[2m] = g^2[2m]/(g[2m-2]*g[2m+2]), where g[2m] represents the number of Goldbach partitions for the even number 2m. The participants suggest that these zones relate to the divisibility of the numbers 2m-2, 2m, and 2m+2 by 3, leading to significant variations in the ratio based on their proximity to N or 2N. The conclusion drawn is that the ratio fluctuates between 4 and 0.5 depending on the divisibility conditions of these numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Goldbach's conjecture and partitions
  • Familiarity with mathematical ratios and their implications
  • Knowledge of divisibility rules, particularly concerning the number 3
  • Basic grasp of number theory concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Goldbach partitions in detail, focusing on their mathematical properties
  • Explore the implications of divisibility in number theory, particularly with respect to prime numbers
  • Study the concept of ratios in mathematical sequences and their significance
  • Investigate further into the patterns of Goldbach partitions and their anomalies
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, number theorists, and students interested in advanced number theory, particularly those studying Goldbach's conjecture and its implications.

Paul Mackenzie
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi All;

The following attachment shows a diagram of the ratio

R[2m] = g^2[2m]/g[2m-2]*g[2m+2] where g[2m] is the number of goldbach partitions for the even number 2m.

What is the reason for the "forbidden zones". I understand this is somehow to do with the factors of the even number, but why the empty zones.

Regards
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
If you assume (out of my left sleeve) that g[2m-2],g[2m],g[2m+2] are numbers more or less close to N, whenever the corresponding 2m-2, 2m, 2m+2 are not divisible by 3 (that is, on the lower region of the 'comet'), and close to 2N otherwise (the upper region of the comet), then, as one of 2m-2, 2m, 2m+2 will be divisible by 3 and the others won't, your ratio -- assuming that you mean g^2[2m]/(g[2m-2]*g[2m+2]) -- would end up close to either (4N^2)/(N^2) = 4 or to (N^2)/(2N^2) = 0.5, which is more or less what you see.

But of course, this is just a pile of speculation and loosely founded assumptions on my part.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
980
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K