Ratio Test vs AST

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on determining the interval of convergence for the power series given by the formula. The interval is found to be (0, 18], with convergence at x=18 confirmed through the Alternating Series Test (AST), despite initial confusion regarding the application of the ratio test. A critical point highlighted is the importance of careful step-by-step verification in mathematical processes to avoid errors. The series diverges at x=0, reinforcing the established interval. Ultimately, the correct understanding of convergence at the endpoints is essential for accurately defining the interval of convergence.
cherry
Messages
25
Reaction score
6
Homework Statement
Find the interval of convergence for the given power series.
Relevant Equations
N/A
Hi, I'm having difficulty understanding why the interval of convergence is (0, 18].
When I tested x=18, I got the following conclusion using the ratio test.
IMG_65D89D7F1999-1.jpeg


When I attempt using AST, the function still diverges as the lim (n -> inf) = 2^n / n ≠ 0.
What am I missing?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-05-05 at 2.05.27 PM.png
    Screenshot 2024-05-05 at 2.05.27 PM.png
    11.1 KB · Views: 72
Physics news on Phys.org
cherry said:
Homework Statement: Find the interval of convergence for the given power series.
Relevant Equations: N/A

Hi, I'm having difficulty understanding why the interval of convergence is (0, 18].
When I tested x=18, I got the following conclusion using the ratio test.
View attachment 344579

When I attempt using AST, the function still diverges as the lim (n -> inf) = 2^n / n ≠ 0.
What am I missing?

Thanks!
The series is this:
$$\sum_{n = 1}^\infty \frac{(x - 9)^n}{n(-9)^n}$$
When you substitute x = 18, the numerator is not ##18^n##.
 
Mark44 said:
The series is this:
$$\sum_{n = 1}^\infty \frac{(x - 9)^n}{n(-9)^n}$$
When you substitute x = 18, the numerator is not ##18^n##.
Oh my gosh, thank you!
 
One of the most important things to learn from mathematics is to be careful about each step. It is definitely a learning process. Mathematics is one subject where you need to get a long string of steps correct to get the right answer, and it is fairly unique in that respect. Also, when you are thinking about the hard steps, it is often the easy ones where mistakes occur. So you should make it a habit to review your work with as much attention to the easy steps as you give to the hard steps.
 
It's a power series at the point ##a=9## whose radius of convergence ##R## is given by
<br /> \frac{1}{R} = \limsup _n \frac{1}{\sqrt[n]{n9^n}} = \frac{1}{9}.<br />
Hence, interval of convergence contains ##(0,18)##. For ##x=18## we get ## \sum \frac{(-1)^n}{n} ##, which converges. For ##x=0## we get divergence. So the interval of convergence is ##(0,18]##.
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...

Similar threads