Re-parametrization of Geodesics: Can You Confirm?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bloby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geodesics
bloby
Messages
112
Reaction score
8
Hello.

If I find a solution of the geodesic equation and I change the parametrization, the new function does not
satisfy this equation for a general re-parametrization. But the world line is the same.

Can you confirm it: does it come from the fact that we usually choose [itex]\nabla_VV=0[/itex] instead of
[itex]\nabla_VV=fV[/itex]for the geodesic equation?
 
on Phys.org
bloby said:
Hello.

If I find a solution of the geodesic equation and I change the parametrization, the new function does not
satisfy this equation for a general re-parametrization. But the world line is the same.

Can you confirm it: does it come from the fact that we usually choose [itex]\nabla_VV=0[/itex] instead of
[itex]\nabla_VV=fV[/itex]for the geodesic equation?

Yes. Only parameters related by a linear function will satisfy the simple form of geodesic equation. Further, invariant interval (proper time or distance) is one of the possible solutions, so only e.g. aτ+b will work as another parametrization and still satisfy this equation.
 
Ok, thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K