B Reactionless Drive Using Light Bouncing Off Moving Mirrors

Click For Summary
The discussion presents a concept for a reactionless drive involving light pulses bouncing between two mirrors that oscillate at relativistic speeds. The analysis highlights how the momentum change of the reflecting photons differs based on the mirrors' velocities, leading to a net momentum change in the system. The relativistic Doppler effect is applied to explain the wavelength shifts experienced by the light in each mirror's reference frame. However, the thread is ultimately closed due to forum rules against discussing reactionless drives. The conversation underscores the challenges and controversies surrounding unconventional propulsion theories.
alas666
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
Poster has been reminded that we do not allow discussions about Reactionless Drives
TL;DR
reactionless drive, relativistic Doppler, reflection from moving mirror
Here is a concept suggesting reactionless drive:

Setup: A light pulse of wavelength l0 bouncing between 2 mirrors one on the left - ML and one on the right - MR. Each mirror oscillates perpendicularly to light travel direction attaining relativistic speeds vl, vr. Light pulse is timed so it reflects from the ML, moving with vl, when it is moving in the same direction as light pulse, while reflection from MR happens when vr opposes light direction.

Analysis: The reflecting photon momentum change is dp = 2h/l. The wavelength lL=l0((1+vl/c)/(1-vl/c))^-1 is red shifted in ML reference frame, while MR wavelength IR = l0*((1-vl/c)/(1+vl/c))^-1 is blue shifted, as per wikipedia relativistic Doppler effect. The traveling light is changing a wavelength at each reflection in setup reference frame: lL = l0 (1-(vl/c)^2)/(1-2vl/c+(vl/c)^2) - red shifted, IR = I0 (1-(vr/c)^2)/(1+2vr/c+(vr/c)^2) - blue shifted (see https://arxiv.org/pdf/1207.0998.pdf). To maintain wavelength unchanged after 2 bounces one have to assure that vl, vr selected correctly.

Conclusion: Because change of the momentum in mirror reference frame is different for MR and ML there is a resulting net momentum change impacting setup.

where have I wronged ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
alas666 said:
where have I wronged ?
A. Thinking that PF ios a good place to discuss personal theories.
B. Thinking momentum is not conserved.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Grasshopper, russ_watters and Dale
alas666 said:
Summary:: reactionless drive, relativistic Doppler, reflection from moving mirror

Here is a concept suggesting reactionless drive:
Per the PF Rules (see INFO at the top of the page), we do not discuss reactionless drives. Thread is closed.

Forbidden Topics said:
EMDrive and other reactionless drives
See https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/nasas-em-drive.884753/
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
10K