Reading for dark matter versus modified gravity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of finding accessible resources for understanding the debate between dark matter and modified gravity theories. It highlights the lack of layperson-friendly textbooks, as most relevant literature is aimed at researchers and assumes familiarity with complex concepts. A suggested resource is a blog post from 2012 that features a dialogue among scientists discussing these theories, though it may still be too advanced for those without a background in the field. The conversation acknowledges that while the scientific discourse has evolved, the fundamental issues remain similar.
windy miller
Messages
306
Reaction score
28
Does anyone have any good laypersons reads to get a good summary the dark matter versus modified gravity?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will not find a textbook on this. The discussion is going on in the scientific literature. Which, as you know, is not written for laypeople.
 
  • Like
Likes windy miller
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and windy miller
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • Featured
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
119
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
422
Back
Top