Reading Newton's Principia: A Modern English Translation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter clinden
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges of reading Isaac Newton's "Principia" in its English translation, specifically the Great Books version. Participants seek recommendations for a modern translation that maintains the original proposition sequence while simplifying the language for better comprehension. A suggested resource is a 1999 translation available on Amazon, which includes a comprehensive guide to the text, enhancing understanding for readers. The conversation highlights the difficulty posed by archaic wording rather than the mathematical content itself.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with Isaac Newton's "Principia" and its significance in physics.
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts to appreciate the content of the text.
  • Knowledge of translation nuances in historical scientific literature.
  • Ability to navigate academic resources and guides related to classical texts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the 1999 translation of Newton's "Principia" and its accompanying guide.
  • Explore modern undergraduate physics textbooks that simplify classical mechanics.
  • Investigate other contemporary translations of historical scientific works.
  • Learn about the historical context of Newton's work and its impact on modern science.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators seeking accessible resources for teaching classical mechanics, and anyone interested in the historical development of scientific thought through Newton's work.

clinden
Messages
18
Reaction score
1
I have just completed reading an English translation (The Great Books version) of Newton's Principia and found it rough going. Does anyone know of a modern English translation that adheres to the proposition sequence but puts each idea and proof into an easy to understand form, e.g., such as a good undergraduate physics book would do? The math was not the problem, but rather, the somewhat archaic wording and phraseology.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Congrats on getting through it though. I was not so successful. I hope you got something out of the experience!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
23K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K