Real Analysis Help: Proving Positive Real Numbers for Beginners

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that for any positive real number x, there exists an integer n such that na ≤ x ≤ (n+1)a, where a is a positive number. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the well-ordered property of non-negative integers and the concept that for any y, there exists an integer n such that n ≤ y ≤ n + 1. These foundational concepts are crucial for approaching the proof effectively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of positive real numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with the well-ordered property of non-negative integers
  • Knowledge of basic inequalities and integer properties
  • Ability to manipulate and reason with mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the well-ordered property of the set of non-negative integers
  • Learn about the properties of inequalities involving real numbers
  • Explore proofs involving the existence of integers satisfying certain conditions
  • Practice problems related to real analysis and integer properties
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to strengthen their understanding of proofs involving positive real numbers and integer properties.

Chemistry101
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
1. Let a be a positive number. Prove that for each positive real number x there is an integer n such that na≤x≤(n+1)a.

I have been looking through mounds of books, but haven't figured out where to start. Our teacher just left us hanging on how to figure it out. I am severely stuck and need help on how to get the problem started.
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you have to work with? Do you, for example, know that "for any y, there exist n such that [itex]n\le y\le n+1[/itex]"? If so, think about y/a.

If you don't know that, do you know that "every set of non-negative integers has a smallest member" (the "well-ordered property" of the non-negative integers). It's not too difficult to use that to prove the property I mentioned above. Think about the set of all positive integers larger than y.

Obviously, in order to prove something about positive integers, you have to use some property of positive integers!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K