Real Analysis Proof: r(n), t(n), e, and n

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that t(n) = (1 + 1/n)^(n+1) is greater than r(n) = (1 + 1/n)^n for all n, and that the limit of the difference t(n) - r(n) approaches zero as n approaches infinity. It is established that t(n) can be expressed as r(n) multiplied by (1 + 1/n), confirming t(n) > r(n). Additionally, the sequence {t_n} is shown to be decreasing, with the limit converging to e. The application of Bernoulli's inequality is suggested to support these findings, and a calculation for n=10 is recommended to estimate e to three decimal places. The conversation also humorously questions the classification of the problem as real analysis rather than calculus.
teacher2love
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. Let r(n) = (1+1/n)^n and t(n) = (1+1/n)^n+1. (Use r(n) converge to e).
Show that t(n) > r(n) for all n and that lim n->inf(t(n) - r(n)) = 0.
Show that {tn} is a decreasing sequence with limit e. {Hint: express {(1+1/n-1)/(1+1/n)}^n as (1+a)^n and apply Bernoulli's inequality). Use n=10 to calculate upper and lower estimates for e. How large should n be to estimate e to 3 decimal places?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
teacher2love said:
1. Let r(n) = (1+1/n)^n and t(n) = (1+1/n)^n+1. (Use r(n) converge to e).
Show that t(n) > r(n) for all n and that lim n->inf(t(n) - r(n)) = 0.
Show that {tn} is a decreasing sequence with limit e. {Hint: express {(1+1/n-1)/(1+1/n)}^n as (1+a)^n and apply Bernoulli's inequality). Use n=10 to calculate upper and lower estimates for e. How large should n be to estimate e to 3 decimal places?

well about showing that t(n)>r(n) does not appear to be that difficult

(1+\frac{1}{n})^{n+1}=(1+\frac{1}{n})^{n}(1+\frac{1}{n})
now since, (1+\frac{1}{n})>1 we have that

t(n)= (1+\frac{1}{n})^{n+1}=(1+\frac{1}{n})^{n})(1+\frac{1}{n})>(1+\frac{1}{n})^{n}=r(n)

now:

\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}(t(n)-r(n))=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}((1+\frac{1}{n})^{n}(1+\frac{1}{n}))-\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}(1+\frac{1}{n})^{n}=\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}(1+\frac{1}{n})^{n}*\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}(1+\frac{1}{n})-e=e*1-e=0

Now we want to show that t_n-_1>t_n this part is quite easy to show as well

\frac{t_n-_1}{t_n}=\frac{(1+\frac{1}{n-1})^{n}}{(1+\frac{1}{n})^{n+1}}=...=(\frac{n^{2}}{n^{2}-1})^{n}*\frac{n}{n+1}=(\frac{n^2-1+1}{n^{2}-1})^{n}\frac{n}{n+1}=(1+\frac{1}{n^{2}-1})^{n}\frac{n}{n+1} now using bernuli inequality we get:

\frac{t_n-_1}{t_n}=\frac{(1+\frac{1}{n-1})^{n}}{(1+\frac{1}{n})^{n+1}}=...=(\frac{n^{2}}{n^{2}-1})^{n}*\frac{n}{n+1}=<br /> (\frac{n^2-1+1}{n^{2}-1})^{n}\frac{n}{n+1}=<br /> (1+\frac{1}{n^{2}-1})^{n}\frac{n}{n+1}&gt;(1+\frac{n}{n^{2}-1})\frac{n}{n+1}&gt;(1+\frac{n}{n^{2}})\frac{n}{n+1}=1

hence t_n-_1&gt;t_n which means that the sequence is decreasing...


Try to show some work of yours, for people here won't do your homework, and this way you may get more replies.


P.S. This looks more like calculus..lol...where does real analysis come into play here?!
 
Last edited:
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K