Real Analysis - Prove the following: inf A = -sup(-A)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the relationship between the infimum of a set A of real numbers and the supremum of its negation, -A. Specifically, it establishes that inf A = -sup(-A) for a nonempty set A that is bounded below. The proof involves demonstrating two inequalities: inf(A) ≤ -sup(-A) and inf(A) ≥ -sup(-A), which together confirm the equality. The approach suggested includes starting with the definitions of infimum and supremum and defining a new set B = -A to facilitate the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of infimum and supremum in real analysis
  • Familiarity with set notation and operations
  • Knowledge of the properties of bounded sets
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and inequalities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of infimum and supremum in detail
  • Learn how to manipulate inequalities in real analysis
  • Explore examples of bounded and unbounded sets in real numbers
  • Practice proving relationships between sets and their transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students of real analysis, mathematicians, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of bounded sets and their infimum and supremum relationships.

jmac85
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let A be a nonempty set of real numbers which is bounded below. Let -A be the set of all numbers -x, where x is in A. Prove that:
inf A = -Sup(-A)

Homework Equations



What should I use as a starting statement? I understand that its true. It makes sense in my head but I can't get it out on paper. l believe this to be right, although I'm not sure if my assumptions are correct or if what I did is actually legal to do. This is from Rudin's Principlese of Mathematical Analysis - Page 22 - Problem 6


The Attempt at a Solution



By definition --
inf A --> x <= y where y is in A
sup(-A) --> -x >= -y where y is in A

Thus --
-sup(-A) --> -(-x >= -y) --> x <= y

So we see --
-sup(-A) --> x <= y where y is in A

Therefore --
inf A = -sup(-A)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you've done is show that the negative of a lower bound of A is an upper bound of -A. But you haven't proven that the negative of the greatest lower bound is the least upper bound of -A.
 
You may want to approach the problem by proving these 2 inequalities :

1) inf(A) <= -sup(-A) , or equivalently, sup(-A) <= -inf(A)

2) inf(A) >= -sup(-A)

Combining these 2 inequalities will give you the desired result.
 
Start with definition of infimum and supremum.
Then take sup A where A is a set of real numbers.
Define a set B = -A. Take inf of B.
 
Thank you all! I'll be working on the problem again tonight, this time with some new things to try!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K