Real Analysis: Proving mn=1 Implies m & n = ±1

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that if m and n are integers such that mn = 1, then the only valid integer pairs are (1, 1) and (-1, -1). The reasoning is based on the properties of integers and fractions, demonstrating that for mn to equal 1, both m and n must be either 1 or -1. Any other integer values for m or n lead to non-integer results, thus invalidating those pairs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integer properties
  • Basic knowledge of fractions and their implications
  • Familiarity with mathematical proofs
  • Concept of multiplicative inverses
NEXT STEPS
  • Study integer properties in number theory
  • Explore the concept of multiplicative inverses in depth
  • Learn about mathematical proof techniques, particularly direct proof
  • Investigate the implications of integer constraints in algebraic equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in number theory and mathematical proofs.

johnjuwax
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Prove or disprove that if m and n are integers such that mn = 1 then either m= 1 & n = 1 or else m = -1 & n = -1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
johnjuwax said:
Prove or disprove that if m and n are integers such that mn = 1 then either m= 1 & n = 1 or else m = -1 & n = -1.

If mn=1, then m/1=1/n. But for n an integrer, then m is a fraction. The only way both are integers is if n=1 so that m=1, or if n=-1 so that m=-1.
 
It follows from the fact that, if m>1, then 0<n<1, and if m<-1, then -1<n<0. Therefore we have three options left to check, m=-1, 0, 1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K