(Real Analysis) Show the function is Bijection

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around demonstrating that a given function is a bijection. The original poster expresses difficulty in solving for x and understanding the definitions related to injections and bijections.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definitions of injection and bijection, questioning the original poster's approach to proving the function's properties. There are attempts to clarify the necessary steps for showing that the function is one-to-one and onto.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the definitions and implications of bijections and injections. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to solve for x in terms of y and to ensure that solutions are unique. There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and their applications.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the definitions of functions, injections, and bijections, as well as the implications of unique solutions in the context of the problem. The original poster's attempts and the responses suggest a need for clarity on these concepts.

phillyolly
Messages
157
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The problem and my attempt are attached.

I am unable to solve the function for x.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • pic.jpg
    pic.jpg
    6.8 KB · Views: 439
  • IMG_0142.jpg
    IMG_0142.jpg
    25.3 KB · Views: 466
Physics news on Phys.org
hmm, if you want to show injection, you need to show for all the values in the domain, now you only showing [tex]-1\neq1[/tex] how about [tex]-1\neq-1.1[/tex]?

so if you want to show an injection first see the definition of injection

whenever [tex]x\neq y \Rightarrow f(x) \neq f(y)[/tex]

or the contrapositive [tex]f(x)=f(y) \Rightarrow x=y[/tex]

normally i use the second one, so, for any for any x,y in R [tex]f(x)=f(y)\Rightarrow... \Rightarrow x=y[/tex]

that will complete the injection
 
Last edited:
hmm i just learn the latex, i don't know if there's a bug or its just me who did it wrong, I'm sorry, if i convey the different thing, try to refresh it ;P and sorry for my english
 
I don't understand what you're trying to do in 1). You say "Injection proof -1 [itex]\neq[/itex]1, and then go on to set f(-1) equal to f(1). ?

The idea here is the if f(a) = f(b), and f is one-to-one (i.e., f is an injection), then a = b.

The function is one-to-one.

To solve for x in the equation y = x/sqrt(x^2 + 1), square both sides of the equation, then move all terms in x to one side, and then factor.

It's a little tricky, because squaring both sides introduces extraneous solutions, so the equation for x does not seem to be a function. You will need to simplify the equation somewhat to make x a one-to-one function of y.
 
The definition for a bijection I usually use is:

Given [tex]f: A \rightarrow B,[/tex] f is a bijection if and only if

EDIT (thanks annoymage): [tex]\forall y \in B , \exists !x \in A \ni f(x) = y.[/tex]

"For all y in B, there exists a unique x in A such that f(x) = y."
 
Last edited:
Raskolnikov said:
The definition for a bijection I usually use is:

Given [tex]f: A \rightarrow B,[/tex] f is a bijection if and only if

[tex]\forall x \in A , \exists !y \in B \ni f(x) = y.[/tex]

"For all x in A, there exists a unique y in B such that f(x) = y."

hey, aren't that the definition of a function?
 
annoymage said:
hey, aren't that the definition of a function?

Yep, I have it backwards. Sorry, I'm a bit sleepy. It should be:

[tex] \forall y \in B , \exists !x \in A \ni f(x) = y. [/tex]
 
Raskolnikov said:
Yep, I have it backwards. Sorry, I'm a bit sleepy. It should be:

[tex] \forall y \in B , \exists !x \in A \ni f(x) = y. [/tex]

but that's the definition of a surjection
 
annoymage, I think you're right.
 
  • #10
nope, the unique x part makes it a bijection. It's subtle but it's there! A surjection only guarantees there exists an x in A. A bijection tells us it's a unique x.
 
  • #11
i see i see
 
  • #12
The process is still of course the same:
Solve for x in terms of y and show that's it's a unique solution.
 
  • #13
Based on your feedback. This is my bijection thing.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0144.jpg
    IMG_0144.jpg
    20.1 KB · Views: 438
  • #14
I would rather you do as Mark44 suggested and solve for x in terms of y.
 
  • #15
phillyolly said:
Based on your feedback. This is my bijection thing.

this complete the injection, and now as mark44 suggested to do for the surjection
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K