Real Analysis: Worked Examples and Graphical Representations

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Highway
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Image Images Inverse
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around finding resources for worked examples and graphical representations in real analysis, particularly for someone revisiting the subject after an introductory course. The scope includes recommendations for books or websites that provide clarity on real analysis concepts through examples and visual aids.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks resources for worked examples and graphical representations to aid understanding of real analysis concepts.
  • Another participant questions the types of problems being referred to and whether the request is for a real analysis text or a prerequisite text.
  • A specific textbook, "Bartle & Sherbert, Introduction to Real Analysis," is mentioned by the original poster as the material being reviewed.
  • One participant suggests that a "pre Real Analysis" book may be necessary for the topics discussed, expressing uncertainty about modern texts.
  • Another participant notes that the expectation for graphical presentations and detailed examples in real analysis may be unrealistic, emphasizing the need for understanding material in a more formal manner.
  • A suggestion is made that "How to Prove It" by Velleman contains exercises that may be helpful for the original poster.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the necessity and availability of resources that provide graphical representations and worked examples in real analysis. There is no consensus on the best approach to bridging the gap between traditional math courses and advanced mathematics.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the limitations of expecting graphical aids in real analysis, suggesting that the material is typically presented in a more formal and legalistic manner. There is also an acknowledgment of the need to adapt one's thinking when transitioning to advanced mathematics.

Highway
Messages
349
Reaction score
1
Does anyone know of a good resource for these types of problems?

I took an Intro to Real Analysis class as an undergrad and didn't do so well in it, but now I am working back through the book, and it is making A LOT more sense than it did back then.

However, I was looking for some worked out examples, and possibly graphing, to help me understand this stuff better as I go through it. . .

Does anyone know of a good book / site?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Highway said:
Does anyone know of a good resource for these types of problems?

What types of problems? The title of your post suggests something more elementary that the central themes of a real analysis course. Are you asking for a recommendation for another real analysis text? Or do you need a text that explains the prerequisites for the real analysis text that you already have?

What real analysis text do you have?
 
Text: Bartle & Sherbert, Introduction to Real Analysis, 3rd Edition

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0471321486/?tag=pfamazon01-20

The class is the first proof writing class for undergrads that our school offers for math majors and other students who want to take more advanced math classes.

This is all in the first chapter of the book.

6BSYm.jpg


s7zev.jpg
 
Fo those pages, you need a "pre Real Analysis" book. I don't keep track of modern math texts and I haven't been a student since the 1980's. Let's hope some other forum member will know of such a book.

I don't know your purpose in reviewing the Real Analysis coures. I sense that what you want is the type of presentation that one see's in secondary math texts - useful graphs, detailed examples, important things highlighted in red etc. That would be nice, but for the material in a Real Analysis course, it maybe an unrealistic expectation. Also, that sort of presentation doesn't prepare you for advanced mathematics courses. In advanced courses, you should form the habit of making your own examples. The material must be understood in a verbal and legalistic fashion, not a graphical one. The exercises won't consist of ten or fifiteen problems that are solved by essentially the same technique.
 
I think "how to prove it" by Velleman contains a lot of such exercises...
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Fo those pages, you need a "pre Real Analysis" book. I don't keep track of modern math texts and I haven't been a student since the 1980's. Let's hope some other forum member will know of such a book.

I don't know your purpose in reviewing the Real Analysis coures. I sense that what you want is the type of presentation that one see's in secondary math texts - useful graphs, detailed examples, important things highlighted in red etc. That would be nice, but for the material in a Real Analysis course, it maybe an unrealistic expectation. Also, that sort of presentation doesn't prepare you for advanced mathematics courses. In advanced courses, you should form the habit of making your own examples. The material must be understood in a verbal and legalistic fashion, not a graphical one. The exercises won't consist of ten or fifiteen problems that are solved by essentially the same technique.

Thanks, I think I need to change my way of thinking to this -- I really am trying to bridge the gap between traditional "math" courses and these types of advanced math courses.

micromass said:
I think "how to prove it" by Velleman contains a lot of such exercises...

Thanks, I will check this out!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
9K