Real and complex canonical forms

  • Thread starter Thread starter alvielwj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Forms
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the canonical forms of the quadratic form q(x,y,z) = x² + 2xy + 4yz + z² over the real numbers (R) and complex numbers (C). The matrix representation derived is [[1, √2, 0], [√2, 0, 2], [0, 2, 1]], which is transformed into the identity matrix through double operations. The canonical form over R is established as diag(I_r, -I_s, O_t), while the canonical form over C is diag(I_r, 0_t). The discussion raises questions about the uniqueness of canonical forms and the generality of matrices having similar canonical forms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quadratic forms
  • Familiarity with matrix operations and transformations
  • Knowledge of canonical forms in linear algebra
  • Basic concepts of real and complex number systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of diagonalization of matrices
  • Learn about Sylvester's Law of Inertia
  • Explore the concept of Jordan canonical form
  • Investigate the implications of canonical forms in optimization problems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in the properties and applications of quadratic forms and canonical forms in both real and complex contexts.

alvielwj
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
A question about how find the canonical forms over R and C.
An example, given a quadratic form,q(x,y,z)=x^2 + 2xy + 4yz + z^2
find the canonical forms over R and C.

First step,i get the matrix 1 2^0.5 0
2^0.5 0 2
0 2 1
then by doing the double operation
i get the identiy matrix.
the canonical form over R is diag(I_r, -I_s, O_t)
and the canonical form over C is diag(I_r,0_t)
is the canonical form unique?
what are the final anwsers?

I know that any matrix can be changed to Identity matrix or a matrix with a 0 row.
does it mean most matries have similar canonical form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Canonical is no property which is defined in any way. It literally means: "How it is usually done (written in the canon)". So whenever there is a usual way to the goal, then it is said canonical. In this case a canonical form, better standard form, is the one which has no mixed terms ##x_ix_j## and only squares ##x_i^2##.

See http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~twm/MTH6140/la26.pdf
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
972
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
19K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K