Really confused on graphical determinations of speed vs. time data

Click For Summary
Graphical determination of average velocity using the slope of a best-fit line is debated, with some arguing it is not more accurate than simply dividing total distance by total time. The discussion highlights that averaging multiple velocities over small time intervals may yield similar results to the graphical method if enough data points are used. The use of the UGRAFIT Graphing Program is seen as more convenient for handling large datasets, but some argue it ultimately performs the same calculation as manual methods. The instructor's questions are criticized for being contradictory, particularly regarding the accuracy of graphical methods versus basic calculations. Overall, there is confusion about the validity of graphical methods in determining average velocity.
terpsgirl
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I'm taking physics as a summer course and am having trouble on 3 questions in my pre-lab. I can't really explain...

1) Why is a graphical determination of the avg velocity obtained from the slope of a best-fit line drawn for the data more accurate than simply dividing the total distance by the total time?

I said it's more accurate because it shows you visually the data points and the spread.

2) WHy is a graphical determination of the avg velocity obtained from the slope of a best-fit line drawn for the data more accurate than calculating several velocities over small time intervals and averaging them together?Not sure?

3) Why is it more accurate to use the UGRAFIT Graphing Program to graphy, draw and determine the slpe of the best-fit line than to do the same by hand on a piece of graphy paper?

I said because sometimes when you end up w/ a lot of data it is more convienient and faster to do the data through the program because it comes out cleaner and saves time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Why is a graphical determination of the avg velocity obtained from the slope of a best-fit line drawn for the data more accurate than simply dividing the total distance by the total time?

It isn't.



2) WHy is a graphical determination of the avg velocity obtained from the slope of a best-fit line drawn for the data more accurate than calculating several velocities over small time intervals and averaging them together?

It isn't, if you average enough velocities.

3) Why is it more accurate to use the UGRAFIT Graphing Program to graphy, draw and determine the slpe of the best-fit line than to do the same by hand on a piece of graphy paper?

LOL! Your instructor's third question completely contradicts his first, since the graphing program divides the total distance by the total time. (Although it shows you a picture of a slope, it doesn't actually physically measure the sides of the slope triangle like you would when doing them by hand.)
 
Why?

JohnDubYa said:
1) Why is a graphical determination of the avg velocity obtained from the slope of a best-fit line drawn for the data more accurate than simply dividing the total distance by the total time?

It isn't.


Why is this? My answer was that it was more accurate.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K