Rearrangement of a complex radiation formula

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the activity in becquerels from the exposure rate of 137Cs, given a complex formula that relates exposure to activity. The original poster expresses difficulty in rearranging the formula to isolate the activity variable.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the complexity of the formula and the need to rearrange it. Questions arise regarding the symbols used in the formula and their meanings. Some participants suggest alternative methods, such as using the gamma constant for Cs-137, while others express uncertainty about the source of the formula.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the formula and its components, with some participants providing alternative approaches. Guidance has been offered regarding the gamma constant, but no consensus has been reached on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the formula was not provided in their coursework, leading to confusion. There is also mention of needing to convert units for the gamma constant and understanding the relationship between different units of measurement.

murdrobe
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



6. If the exposure rate from 137Cs at one metre is 2.50 mGy/h, how many bequerels are present?

Homework Equations



X=5.263 x 10-6 A∑(yiEi(μen/ρ)i)/r2

The Attempt at a Solution



what I am looking to do isn't to solve the question, i need to rearrange the formula above so that A is the subject and i have no idea where to begin due to its complexity.

i would also like to know what the symbols represent, my interpretation from what i have found is that:

X = the exposure measured in Roetengens
A = The activity of the source measured in Bequerels
∑ = this sigma sign is equal to a complex value. To gather this number the individual energy of each photon that this radiation source can produce must be known and multiplied by the rate that they are produced. This is due to the fact that a gamma source does not produce a single energy level but instead there is a range of energies produced.
yi = The initial Yield from this source before any decay
Ei = the initial energy of this source before any decay
E = the energy of the photons
i = The value of i on its own refers to the fact that the calculation must use the initial values of μen/ρ.
r^2 = the distance away that the measurement is taken

please could someone check that this is correct. we were not given this formula or taught how to use it so I am struggeling.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you weren't given that formula, where did you get it from? It's far easier to use the gamma constant for Cs-137, especially since they didn't give you the value for μen/ρ, which changes depending on photon energy. Your formula should read

X=5.263 x 10-6A∑(yiEien/ρ)i)/r2, where the summation is over all photon energies. However, when you use the gamma constant, this summation is already calculated for you.
 
We weren't given anything for this calculation, as a group we found an online calculator that said this was the formula for it. Although it'd be fantastic if there is a simpler way, I'm not sure how to do what you suggested either
 
There are numerous sources for the gamma constant (G) for Cs-137. The Rad Health Handbook lists the gamma constant as 3.3 R-cm2/hr-mCi, and the formula would be X = AG/r2, so all you need to do is perform some algebra and unit conversions to get the activity.
 
this is FAR easier, thank you
 
A = xr2 / G

so then i need to convert the units for G to bequerels? but what is R in the R-cm2/hr-mCi

does that mean its 3.3 x 1002 is equal to the value in milicuries?

1002 due to my calculation being at 1m
 
Yes, millicuries to Becquerels, and R (Roentgen) to mGy. 1 rad = 0.877 roentgen
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
35
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K