Rearranging Formula: Solving for Vw

  • Thread starter Thread starter XxphysicsxX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
To solve for Vw in the equation Fd = (Vw / (Vw - Vs)) fs, it's essential to avoid incorrectly canceling terms. The user initially attempts to manipulate the equation but mistakenly treats VwFs as separate when they should be considered together. The correct approach involves keeping VwFs intact while rearranging the equation. Utilizing algebraic rules, such as factoring and distributing, will help in accurately isolating Vw. Following these guidelines should clarify the steps needed to successfully rearrange the formula.
XxphysicsxX
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
how do i rearrange for Vw??

I just end up canceling the Vw's when I solve it...
Thanks in advance

the formula is:

(Fd)= [(Vw) / (Vw-Vs)] (fs)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Can you write out your working and show how they cancel out? That way someone can help you see if you made a mistake in your algebra.
 
Zryn said:
Can you write out your working and show how they cancel out? That way someone can help you see if you made a mistake in your algebra.

i get:

Fd (Vw- Vs) = VwFs
Fd( Vw-Vs) - Vw= Fs

and i don't go ant further since the first Vw is a possitive and the second is a negative... meaning they'll cancel each other out..
dont know what I am doing wrong!
 
When you have two terms multiplied together, such as VwFs, you can not simply split them up like you have done:

Fd (Vw- Vs) = VwFs --> Fd( Vw-Vs) - Vw= Fs ... incorrect
Fd (Vw- Vs) = VwFs --> Fd( Vw-Vs) - VwFs = 0 ... correct

You have to consider them a lumped package when you move them around, essentially you have subtracted VwFs from both sides of the equation. If you only subtracted Vw from both sides of the equation you would get:

Fd( Vw-Vs) - Vw = FsVw - Vw

And this doesn't help you too much.

What you can do is keep in mind the foremost rules of algebra:

a ( b + c ) = ab + ac which is the same as ab + ac = a ( b + c )

Try using this rule to expand and/or factorize the equation and see if you can rearrange it that way.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top