Reason for just a 0 vector in a null space of a L.I matrix

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the null space of matrices and the linear independence of their columns. Participants explore the conditions under which a matrix with linearly independent columns has only the zero vector in its null space, touching on both theoretical and practical implications.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for an explanation of why matrices with linearly independent columns have only the zero vector in their null space.
  • Another participant provides a description involving basis vectors and their images under the matrix, suggesting that the images are linearly independent.
  • A participant points out that the statement may only hold for square matrices, providing an example of a matrix with dependent columns and a non-zero null space.
  • This same participant notes that if the number of rows is less than the number of columns, the columns cannot be linearly independent, which complicates the discussion.
  • Another participant states that the equation \(A\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{0}\) has a unique solution if and only if the columns of the matrix are linearly independent, reinforcing the initial query.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the conditions under which the null space contains only the zero vector, with some suggesting it applies to square matrices while others highlight exceptions based on the dimensions of the matrix.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions about matrix dimensions and the definitions of linear independence that remain unresolved in the discussion.

Akshay Gundeti
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello Everyone,

Can someone explain why do matrices with linearly independent columns have only 0 vector in their null space?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Akshay Gundeti said:
Can someone explain why do matrices with linearly independent columns have only 0 vector in their null space?
Let A be the matrix and <br /> e_{0} = \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 \\<br /> 0\\<br /> .. \\<br /> 0 \\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />,... <br /> e_{n} = \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 0 \\<br /> 0\\<br /> .. \\<br /> 1 \\<br /> \end{pmatrix}<br />. Then Ae0 is the first column in A, ... and Aen is the last column in A. Therefore, the images of the basis vectors are linearly independent.
 
This is true IF you are talking about square matrices. The null space of the matrix \begin{bmatrix}1 &amp; 0 &amp; 0 \\ 0 &amp; 1 &amp; 0\end{bmatrix} is a one-dimensional subspace of R^3 spanned by \begin{bmatrix}0 \\ 0 \\ 1\end{bmatrix}.
(It suddenly occurs to me that the columns here are NOT independent so that this is not a good example.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
(It suddenly occurs to me that the columns here are NOT independent so that this is not a good example.)
If the number of rows are less than the number of columns, the columns cannot be linearly independent (if there are m rows, with m<n, the maximum number of linearly independent columns are m).
 
If ##\mathbf{a}_1, \mathbf a_2, \ldots \mathbf a_n## are columns of the matrix ##A##, and ##\mathbf x=(x_1, x_2, \ldots x_n)^T##, then $$A\mathbf x = \sum_{k=1}^n x_k \mathbf a_k. $$ Then you immediately see from the definition of linear independence that the equation ##A\mathbf x = \mathbf 0## has unique solution if and only if the vectors ##\mathbf{a}_1, \mathbf a_2, \ldots \mathbf a_n## are linearly independent.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K