Reasoning for the existance of God the Creator

  • Thread starter Thread starter Royce
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the reasoning for the existence of God as the Creator, emphasizing the ordered and logical nature of the universe. Proponents argue that the universe's consistency, governed by physical laws, suggests purpose and intent behind its creation, particularly in the evolution of life. They assert that human intelligence and reasoning, which allow us to comprehend the universe, reflect a divine mental image. The argument posits that the precise conditions leading to intelligent life cannot be mere accidents of probability, implying a Creator's influence.Critics counter these claims by highlighting the universe's tendency toward entropy rather than order, questioning the assumption that logic is a universal constant derived from a divine source. They argue that science focuses on "how" and "what" rather than "why," suggesting that attributing purpose to evolution contradicts Darwinian principles. The discussion also touches on the limitations of scientific inquiry regarding the existence of God, noting that while science cannot prove or disprove God's existence, it remains agnostic on the matter.
  • #51
thats kinda good but not that good. it has too many assumptions. I think that God must exist because of this: if the universe is infinite the universe would have died out an infinite time ago. therefore the universe must have begeing. therefore we move on to the big bang theory. In the big bang theory, it is a complete miracle that 1 planet substaining life was created the chances were about 3 trilion or more to 1. therefore scientists believe that there must be an infinite amount of parallel universes. however everything has a cause. there must be somthing creating them. For argument's sake let us call this God #1 this God can create parrallel universes all the time however for the reason above, This God could not be constant as in always doing the same thing so therefore it must have the ability to decide when to make worlds because nothing is completely random. therefore it must have a mind like ours with feelings and etc. because simple consiouses only live to live, humans however actually have cause to live we think about ourselves instead of simply trying to make life better. we have morals. This version of God i will call God #2. we know that every thing that can create can also destroy. If this seems like an assumption, please tell me an example where this is not true. There for God #2 has turned into God#3, an almighty God. This God must have at some time wondered what its capabillitys are since it has lived forever and like the human mind, it is inquistive, however this is impossible because it must have at sometime wondered whether it can destroy worlds as soon as it can create them to experiment this it must have started destroying worlds and sreating them simutalniuolsly. if this continues forever. our world would have been destroyed an infiniter time ago. That is not true. so therfor it must know all about itself and how it does things. if it knows all about itself and how it does things. it also obviusly knows al about the worlds it creats it must know every thing unless there is a higher consiousness.either way this God is omnicent and omnipotent to all of us. this God we will call God #4. However since it knows everything and has feelings like us it must know that many of us have cursed him and all the thing said against him. If it is excatly like humans or even near the selfishness that humans have. it would have destroyed us all. therefore this must be a God that is merciful even to the point of someone doing everything he hates. therefore This God must be omnicent,omnicent and all-loving. this is Basicly what God is. thanks for reading through this incredibly long post
 

Similar threads

Back
Top