Reasons for choosing square antenna?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the selection criteria for square versus circular antennas, specifically the rectangular microstrip antenna referenced in the GlobalSpec link. It concludes that the choice between square and circular antennas is not definitive and depends on the specific application requirements. Square antennas may offer advantages such as improved impedance matching and reduced side-lobe radiation, as supported by various scholarly articles. Ultimately, the selection process should be guided by the intended application rather than a blanket preference for one shape over the other.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of microstrip antenna design
  • Familiarity with impedance matching techniques
  • Knowledge of radiation patterns in antennas
  • Basic grasp of the Poincare-Brouwer theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the characteristics of square microstrip antennas
  • Study the implications of the Poincare-Brouwer theorem in antenna design
  • Explore scholarly articles on impedance matching in antennas
  • Learn about the differences in radiation patterns between square and circular antennas
USEFUL FOR

Engineers and designers involved in antenna design, RF engineers, and anyone interested in optimizing antenna performance for specific applications.

Engineering news on Phys.org
qnach said:
Is there any particular reason to choose a square shape antenna like
http://www.globalspec.com/reference...y-4-wavelength-rectangular-microstrip-antenna
instead of a circular shape?
Square is not always better than circular, nor is there ever only one particular reason that would decide the case. You are looking at the selection process backwards. Without having a specific antenna application in mind it would not be possible to select an optimum antenna style.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: qnach
Baluncore said:
Square is not always better than circular, nor is there ever only one particular reason that would decide the case. You are looking at the selection process backwards. Without having a specific antenna application in mind it would not be possible to select an optimum antenna style.

Is such square shape consistent with the Poincare-Brouwer theorem? It seems not much?
 
qnach said:
Is such square shape consistent with the Poincare-Brouwer theorem?
Everything in the universe is consistent with the Poincare-Brouwer theorem.
Please explain why you think it might not be consistent.
How can something be "not much" or partially consistent?
 
I've read white papers claiming that square microstrip antennas have more desirable impedance matching characteristics and less side-lobe radiation than do circular microstrip antennas. Not wanting to repeat tedious simulation work to verify results, I simply apply the findings in faith. There is an abundance of scholarly articles on the subject.
 
qnach said:
Is there any particular reason to choose a square shape antenna like
http://www.globalspec.com/reference...y-4-wavelength-rectangular-microstrip-antenna
instead of a circular shape?
Perhaps an easy way of considering this is that a square patch creates a square slot antenna, and this is equivalent to a square loop in terms of radiation pattern. With loop antennas, the differences in radiation pattern when you change the shape from square to circular are fairly small, it is the enclosed area which is important.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K