Recommendation for Mathematics for Physicist and Engineers book

  • Context: Other 
  • Thread starter Thread starter trv
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for mathematics textbooks suitable for physicists and engineers. Participants share their experiences and preferences regarding various texts, considering their utility for someone preparing for further studies in computer science and revisiting physics concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster (OP) finds Boas' Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences difficult to follow and seeks alternative recommendations.
  • Some participants recommend "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" by Riley, Hobson, and Bence, noting it covers a wide range of topics but may be better as a reference.
  • Others suggest "Mathematics for Physicists" by Martin and Shaw as a simpler alternative to Boas, suitable for those needing more accessible explanations.
  • A participant mentions "Advanced Engineering Mathematics" by Kreyszig as a more advanced option than Boas.
  • Another participant recommends Blennow's textbook, highlighting its advanced nature and connection to the Physics Forums community.
  • One participant suggests using Trefor Bazett's videos as a supplementary resource for studying mathematics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that both books mentioned by the OP are valuable, but there are differing opinions on their levels of complexity and suitability for learning. Some participants advocate for one book over the other based on personal experience, while others suggest a combination of texts for a comprehensive understanding.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the recommended texts, and there are indications that the effectiveness of each book may depend on individual learning styles and prior knowledge.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or professionals in physics or engineering looking for mathematics resources, particularly those transitioning to computer science or seeking to strengthen their mathematical foundations.

trv
Messages
74
Reaction score
9
Hi,

I'm a graduate with a BSc in Physics and MSc in Systems Engineering which I graduated from about 10 years ago. I'm trying to do some prep work in Mathematics with the intention of potentially doing an MSc in Computer Science, but also out of an interest in working through some of the Physics texts from my undergraduate days.

With this in mind I've been trying to work through my copy of Boas' Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences. I'm finding the explanations quite difficult to follow however. Can someone recommend an alternative?

I've come across two potential books:
1) Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering by Riley, Hobson and Bence

https://www.cambridge.org/higheredu...ing/FC466374D5B94E86D969100070CA6483#contents

2) Mathematics for Physicists by Martin and Shaw
https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/9780470660225

Which seems to be a recommended text at the University of Manchester which I understand is one of the better Physics Depts. in the UK. I did try and check a few others, but not all of them include details of the recommended texts.

Any thoughts on the above books? I'm leaning towards the first option, but would appreciate any other recommendations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21 and WWGD
Physics news on Phys.org
I can personally recommend this textbook by Blennow:

1742859842009.png

https://www.amazon.com/Mathematical...attias-ebook/dp/B086H3LMZF/?tag=pfamazon01-20

And it turns out PF has a close connection with the author... https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/the-birth-of-a-textbook/

:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: trv
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: trv
I suggest Trefor Bazett's videos to complement your studies


Maybe give it a try to see if it fits with your approach. I used it to review a couple of things.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: trv
Both books in the OP are great. If you want simpler explanations than Boas then Martin & Shaw is the book for you. RHB is at a higher level and covers much more. If you get both books they will take you from pre-Boas to post-Boas
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: trv
Thanks for the suggestions everyone. I’ve gone with Riley, Hobson and Bence mainly for the fact that it comes with a student solutions manual. I’ll see how I get on and might supplement it with Martin and Shaw as one of you has pointed out that it's a bit lower level than Boas. Luckily these seem a bit of the more affordable side since they're published here in the UK.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21, TensorCalculus and WWGD

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
833
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K