Recommendation for Mathematics for Physicist and Engineers book

  • Context: Other 
  • Thread starter Thread starter trv
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers around recommendations for mathematics textbooks suitable for physicists and engineers. The primary suggestions include "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" by Riley, Hobson, and Bence, which is favored for its comprehensive coverage and inclusion of a student solutions manual, and "Mathematics for Physicists" by Martin and Shaw, noted for its simpler explanations. Additionally, "Advanced Engineering Mathematics" by Kreyszig is mentioned as a valuable reference. The consensus indicates that both recommended books can effectively bridge the gap between Boas' text and more advanced materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus and linear algebra.
  • Familiarity with physics concepts relevant to mathematical applications.
  • Experience with problem-solving techniques in engineering contexts.
  • Knowledge of mathematical notation and terminology used in physics and engineering.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore "Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering" by Riley, Hobson, and Bence.
  • Investigate "Mathematics for Physicists" by Martin and Shaw for foundational concepts.
  • Review "Advanced Engineering Mathematics" by Kreyszig for advanced topics and applications.
  • Watch Trefor Bazett's educational videos to complement textbook learning.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for graduate students in physics or engineering, educators seeking effective teaching resources, and anyone preparing for advanced studies in mathematics or computer science.

trv
Messages
74
Reaction score
9
Hi,

I'm a graduate with a BSc in Physics and MSc in Systems Engineering which I graduated from about 10 years ago. I'm trying to do some prep work in Mathematics with the intention of potentially doing an MSc in Computer Science, but also out of an interest in working through some of the Physics texts from my undergraduate days.

With this in mind I've been trying to work through my copy of Boas' Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences. I'm finding the explanations quite difficult to follow however. Can someone recommend an alternative?

I've come across two potential books:
1) Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering by Riley, Hobson and Bence

https://www.cambridge.org/higheredu...ing/FC466374D5B94E86D969100070CA6483#contents

2) Mathematics for Physicists by Martin and Shaw
https://blackwells.co.uk/bookshop/product/9780470660225

Which seems to be a recommended text at the University of Manchester which I understand is one of the better Physics Depts. in the UK. I did try and check a few others, but not all of them include details of the recommended texts.

Any thoughts on the above books? I'm leaning towards the first option, but would appreciate any other recommendations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21 and WWGD
Physics news on Phys.org
I can personally recommend this textbook by Blennow:

1742859842009.png

https://www.amazon.com/Mathematical...attias-ebook/dp/B086H3LMZF/?tag=pfamazon01-20

And it turns out PF has a close connection with the author... https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/the-birth-of-a-textbook/

:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: trv
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: trv
I suggest Trefor Bazett's videos to complement your studies


Maybe give it a try to see if it fits with your approach. I used it to review a couple of things.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: trv
Both books in the OP are great. If you want simpler explanations than Boas then Martin & Shaw is the book for you. RHB is at a higher level and covers much more. If you get both books they will take you from pre-Boas to post-Boas
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: trv
Thanks for the suggestions everyone. I’ve gone with Riley, Hobson and Bence mainly for the fact that it comes with a student solutions manual. I’ll see how I get on and might supplement it with Martin and Shaw as one of you has pointed out that it's a bit lower level than Boas. Luckily these seem a bit of the more affordable side since they're published here in the UK.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DeBangis21, TensorCalculus and WWGD

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
624
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K