Reconstructing operator matrix from subspace samples

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on reconstructing the matrix of a positive definite operator A using non-orthogonal basis functions. Participants explore methods for estimating off-diagonal elements of A when only certain diagonal blocks are known. A proposed approach involves utilizing any orthogonal basis formed from the union of all basis functions, emphasizing that linear independence suffices for reconstruction. The key challenge identified is determining the coverage of the domain by the small sets of basis functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of positive definite operators in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with matrix reconstruction techniques
  • Knowledge of basis functions and their properties
  • Concept of linear independence versus orthogonality
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for reconstructing matrices from incomplete data
  • Explore the implications of linear independence in matrix theory
  • Study the principles of operator theory in functional analysis
  • Investigate applications of tomography in mathematical reconstruction
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and computational scientists involved in operator theory, matrix analysis, and applications of tomography in reconstructive methods.

uekstrom
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I wonder if there is some agreed-upon best way to reconstruct the matrix of a positive definite operator A using "sampling" (like in tomography). More in detail I want to do this:

I have many small sets of basis functions. The sets are in general not orthogonal. I compute matrix elements <i|A|j>, where |i> and |j> belong to the same "set". In other words, in the non-orthogonal basis I know certain diagonal blocks of A, while the other elements are unknown. I want to determine an estimate of the off diagonal elements.

One way of reconstructing A is to simply take any orthogonal basis for the union of all basis functions, and then work with that. However, the orthogonal basis is not unique. My question is if there is a best way of doing this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need orthogonality, linear independence is sufficient. And it gives you an entire linear equation system for the unknown ##A_{ij}## not only the diagonal. The question is alone which part of the domain you can cover by your small sets.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K