MHB Recurrence relation - initial condition

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the recurrence relation T(n) = 2T(√n) + 1, leading to the transformation S(m) = 2S(m/2) + 1. It establishes the need for an initial condition, suggesting T(2) = S(1) = c, with derived values T(0) = -1 and T(1) = -1. The solution ultimately indicates that T(n) equals -1 for all n, which is confirmed through iterative calculations and limits. The conclusion raises questions about the validity of this result, highlighting its unusual nature.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Smile)

I want to find the exact solution of the recurrence relation: $T(n)=2T(\sqrt{n})+1$.$$m=\lg n \Rightarrow 2^m=n \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 2^{\frac{m}{2}}=\sqrt{n}$$

So we have: $T(2^m)=2T(2^{\frac{m}{2}})+1$

We set $T(2^m)=S(m)$, so we get: $S(m)=2S \left( \frac{m}{2}\right)+1$

$$S(m)=2S \left( \frac{m}{2}\right)+1=2^2S\left( \frac{m}{2^2} \right)+2+1= \dots= 2^i S \left( \frac{m}{2^i}\right)+ \sum_{j=0}^{i-1} 2^j$$If we would have an initial condition, let $S(1)=c$ then we would say that the recursion ends when $\frac{m}{2^i}=1$.

So that the recurrence relation is well-defined, it has to hold the following:

$$ n>\sqrt{n} \Rightarrow n^2>n \Rightarrow n^2-n>0 \Rightarrow n(n-1)>0 \Rightarrow n>1 \wedge n>0 \Rightarrow n \geq 2 \Rightarrow 2^m \geq 2 \Rightarrow m \geq 1$$So does this mean that we have to set $T(2)=S(1)=c$ ? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your initial condition would probably have to be in terms of T(n), not S(n). You can find T(0)= -1 and T(1) = -1 from the equation, though.
If you use the method from my post in http://mathhelpboards.com/discrete-mathematics-set-theory-logic-15/solve-f-n-2f-sqrt-n-n-14405.html, you can find the solution of your recurrence to be
$$ T(n) = \left ( T(2) +1 \right ) \log_{2} n - 1, n = 2^{2^k}.$$
I'm not sure exactly how to solve this for T(2), though. If you take $ T(2) = 2 T( \sqrt 2 ) +1 $ and iterate, you have
$$ T(2) = 2^c T( \sqrt[c] 2 ) +2^{c} - 1 $$ for all $ c \geq 1 $.
Taking the limit, you get
$$ T(2) = \lim_{c \to \infty} \left ( 2^c - 2^c -1 \right ) = -1, $$
which implies that
$$ T(n) = ( -1 +1 ) \log_2 n -1 = -1 $$ for all n.
:confused: This seems to be really weird, until you take the limit as $ i \to \infty $ of the final recurrence relation in your post, which gives us the same answer.
Either I am horribly wrong, or this is the correct solution.
 
Last edited:
First trick I learned this one a long time ago and have used it to entertain and amuse young kids. Ask your friend to write down a three-digit number without showing it to you. Then ask him or her to rearrange the digits to form a new three-digit number. After that, write whichever is the larger number above the other number, and then subtract the smaller from the larger, making sure that you don't see any of the numbers. Then ask the young "victim" to tell you any two of the digits of the...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K