Recursively defined numbers, need to show they are non-decreasing

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter math_question
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers around a recursively defined sequence of positive numbers \{a_n\}, which are solutions to a series of equations involving their predecessors. The initial values are established as a_1 = 1 and a_2 ≈ 1.62, with further values determined numerically. The primary objective is to demonstrate that the sequence is non-decreasing, specifically that a_{n+1} ≥ a_n for all n. Observations indicate that the sequence grows logarithmically, aligning with the harmonic numbers, but proving non-decreasing behavior requires additional conditions, as negative roots complicate the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of recursive sequences and their properties
  • Familiarity with harmonic numbers and their significance
  • Basic knowledge of numerical methods for solving equations
  • Concepts of mathematical induction for proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore mathematical induction techniques for proving properties of sequences
  • Study the relationship between sequences and harmonic numbers in depth
  • Learn numerical methods for approximating solutions to recursive equations
  • Investigate the implications of selecting positive roots in recursive definitions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying sequences and series, and anyone interested in recursive functions and their properties.

math_question
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I have a question involving a sequence of numbers [tex]\{a_n\}[/tex] defined recursively. They are defined as the positive solutions of the following set of equations.

[tex]1 = \frac{1}{a_1} = \frac{1}{(a_2+a_1)} + \frac{1}{{a_2}} =<br /> \frac{1}{(a_3 + a_2 +a_1)} + \frac{1}{(a_3 + a_2)}<br /> + \frac{1}{{a_3}} = \cdots = \frac{1}{(a_n + a_{n-1}+ \cdots +a_1)} + \frac{1}{(a_n + a_{n-1}+<br /> \cdots +a_2)} + \cdots + \frac{1}{{a_n}} = \cdots[/tex]

The first few can be solved analytically [tex]a_1 = 1, a_2 \approx 1.62, \cdots[/tex]. The rest can be found numerically.

However, instead of their values, what I need is to show that these numbers have to be non-decreasing, i.e. [tex]a_{n+1} \geq a_{n}[/tex] for all n.

Any ideas welcome.

Thank you.

Notes:

An observation that might be helpful is that, the numerical solutions show a_n's grow with natural logarithm. ([tex]\ln{(2n+2)}[/tex] seems to fit the numerical solution perfectly. ) Also, [tex]a_n \geq H_n, \text{\, where \,}<br /> H_n = \sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{k} \text{\, is the $n^{\text{th}}$<br /> harmonic number.}[/tex]

The numerical solution suggests [tex]a_{n+1} - a_n[/tex] goes to zero as n goes to infinity. So this might suggest induction is the way to go for the proof. Assume non-decreasing up to a_n, show that [tex]a_{n+1} \geq a_{n}[/tex].
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
##a_2=\frac{1-\sqrt{5}}{2} \approx -0.62## is also a solution, which means ##a_1=1 < a_2\,.##
Hence you cannot prove it without additional conditions. Let us assume the positive root ##a_2=\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}##. Then I get for ##a_3## again two negative roots and one positive. So without a criterion how to select the positive solution instead of a negative one, this cannot be proven from the recursion alone. If we added ##a_n>0## as an assumption, then we first would have to show that there is always such a solution. And the degrees of the ##n-##th term is ##n##, so as you said, it can only be solved numerically. Maybe this can help:

246586
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K