Red - blue shifts and stellar rotation

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of red and blue shifts in relation to the speed and motion of objects revolving around the center of a galaxy. It is noted that while stars do not generally spiral toward the center, the gravitational fields they encounter from other objects can cause a slight red shift in their light. This effect is utilized in measuring the rotation of galaxies, but is small compared to the overall cosmological redshift. References are also mentioned for further reading on the topic.
  • #1
Libmr2bs
5
0
When considering the speed of objects revolving around a galactic boundary and the gravitational confluence at the center of the galaxy, it would appear that all objects would be spiraling toward the center. If an object is spiraling toward that center, then it would appear that light from these objects would experience a red shift as the object would have a relative motion away from any external static frame. What is interesting is that the motion toward the center should cause a red shift from any observable direction except parallel to the axis of rotation. Additionally the observer's field of vision should encompass a larger field of red shift on the near side of the galaxy and the blue shift should encompass a larger field on the far side of the galaxy. The farther away a galaxy the more this shift should be observable.

Does anyone know a reference or simply know if this occurs and how the compensation is made when measuring the expansion of space?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
When considering the speed of objects revolving around a galactic boundary and the gravitational confluence at the center of the galaxy, it would appear that all objects would be spiraling toward the center.

This is not true. Stars in general are in an elliptic orbit around the center.
 
  • #3
I think Mathman is correct that stars are not generally spiralling inwards in a galaxy. However your post prompts another similar thought. We are situated at somewhere mid way between the centre of the Milky Way and the perimiter. Should there not be a detectable blue shift from stars further out towards the perimeter than us and a corresponding red shift from stars nearer the centre simply due to their location in the gravitational well of the galaxy as a whole? I imagine this effect would be very slight and difficult to detect due to the individual motions of stars in orbit around the galaxy centre.

Does anyone know if the long axis of the individual eliptical orbits around the galaxy are generally parallel or randomly orientated?
 
  • #4
Spiraling toward the center was intended to be general. Each object will have an orbit that most probably would be ellipical but the gravititational fields that it would encounter from other near objects in non-parallel orbits would cause a "bumpy" ride.

For an object to be in orbit requires a velocity with a radial orientated vector that retains it in orbit. It's this radial component that I'm interested in and how it affects the shift. I imagined that it would be only slight but it would appear that a red shift would always be larger than a blue shift due to this radial velocity from any reference frame except parallel to a central axis of the galaxy. This appears to be what is happening and I've been unable to find a reference that considers this vector or attempts to measure it.
 
  • #5
The red and blue shift in the 21cm HI radio line is routinely used to measure the rotation of our and other galaxies. So yes, this effect is known and utilised. However, the magnitude of this shift in frequency is relatively small, so for distant galaxies the cosmological redshift is much greater.

When taking the spectrum of a distant galaxy to determine its redshift, the light from the whole galaxy is considered. Indeed this does mean that some of that light is a little more redshifted and some a little more blueshifted due to the rotation of the galaxy. The effect of this, when the light is considered together, is to smear out each line in the spectrum a little bit, since the redshift is not all exactly the same. As I say though, this effect is relatively small and this smearing not a huge problem. It doesn't alter the centre of the peak in frequency and hence doesn't affect out measurement of redshift.
 
  • #6
Can you supply any references. I ran across some information that basically says that we can't see the center of our galaxy. This would imply that our measurements of other galaxies would be based on the outer regions - those nearest to the reference frame. In face-on spiral galaxies, calculations of the Hubble constant appear to be less than those calculated from side view (axis perpendicular to path). Just wondering whether there was a link and I find references to angluar velocities but no radial velocities.
 
  • #7
We can't see the centre of our galaxy because we sit inside the dusty disk of our own galaxy. For other galaxies, the centre is typically the brightest region. For a galaxy seen edge on, then indeed we can't get a good look at the centre. However as I said, the extra redshift from one side of the galaxy is guaranteed to balance the extra blueshift from the other side such that the centroid of the spectral line in unchanged. In any case as I said this effect is small compared to the cosmological redshift.
 
  • #8
I understand the reason why we can't see the center of our galaxy. But the effect is not limited to our galaxy.

There simply does not appear to be anyone who has access to a large telescope that has scanned across a galaxy to verify experimentally what you say. If there is I haven't found a reference.

Related to my search there is a question that if space is expanding and galaxies are moving apart, how could they collide.
 
  • #9
Have a look http://hubblesite.org/gallery/album/galaxy_collection/" for many beautiful pictures of galaxies taken with Hubble. As you will see, the centre is almost always the brightest part, except in cases where a disk galaxy is seen edge on.

Mapping the rotation curves of galaxies (i.e. scanning across a galaxy measuring the relative red and blueshift) has been done routinely for about 70 years or so. A quick search over at ADS yielded something over 80 thousand papers. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/n...xt_wgt=YES&ttl_sco=YES&txt_sco=YES&version=1" is the search result.

Just for kicks, have a look at http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1914LowOB...2...66S" paper from 1914 that describes mapping the rotation, using spectroscopy (i.e. to look for the doppler shift), of the "Virgo Nebula', now known to be a galaxy. When this measurement was made we didn't even know there were other galaxies than our own.

As for your last question, space isn't expanding in the literal sense of the words. It's perfectly acceptable to think of the expanding universe as galaxies flying apart, just remember that everything is moving away from everything else, not from any central point. Indeed, observations show that galaxy mergers were much more common in the past than today, since the Universe used to be a lot more crowded. In any case, the Universe is not completely smooth, and there are many regions, such as clusters of galaxies, where there is no expansion at all. The local overdensity of gravity has captured the galaxies such that they are now a bound system. Within these clusters, galaxies fly around roughly orbiting the centre of the cluster. Sometimes they collide with other galaxies in the same cluster.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What is a red shift and how does it relate to stellar rotation?

A red shift is a phenomenon in which light from an object appears to have a longer wavelength, moving towards the red end of the light spectrum. This can occur due to the Doppler effect, which is caused by the movement of the object away from the observer. Stellar rotation can contribute to a red shift because as a star rotates, different parts of it may be moving towards or away from the observer, causing a change in the perceived wavelength of the light emitted.

2. How does a blue shift differ from a red shift in terms of stellar rotation?

A blue shift is the opposite of a red shift, in which light from an object appears to have a shorter wavelength, moving towards the blue end of the light spectrum. This can occur if the object is moving towards the observer, causing the wavelength of the light to be compressed. In terms of stellar rotation, a blue shift may occur if a star is rotating towards the observer, causing certain parts of it to move closer and emit shorter wavelengths of light.

3. Can red and blue shifts be used to determine the rotation rate of a star?

Yes, red and blue shifts can be used to determine the rotation rate of a star. By measuring the amount of red or blue shift in the light emitted from a star, scientists can calculate the speed at which different parts of the star are moving towards or away from the observer. This can then be used to determine the rotation rate of the star.

4. What other factors can contribute to red and blue shifts in stars?

In addition to stellar rotation, red and blue shifts can also be caused by the gravitational pull of other objects. This is known as gravitational redshift or blueshift. The presence of a massive object, such as a black hole, can cause a shift in the wavelengths of light emitted from a star. This shift can be used to study the effects of gravity on celestial objects.

5. How do red and blue shifts help us understand the properties of stars?

Red and blue shifts can provide valuable information about the properties of stars, such as their rotation rates, mass, and composition. By measuring the amount of shift in the light emitted from a star, scientists can determine its speed, distance, and other important characteristics. This can help us better understand the life cycle of stars and how they evolve over time.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
746
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
6
Views
892
  • Cosmology
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
46
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top