Reduced Exponential: Work & Formulae

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ianbell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the "reduced exponential," defined as the series Sum_i=1 to infinity x^(i-1) / i!, where x is an element of a general algebra. It is established that the reduced exponential is equivalent to (exp(x)-1)/x only when x is invertible. The conversation highlights the challenges of notation when x is not invertible, particularly in the context of matrices, where the reduced exponential can still be defined. Participants express a lack of familiarity with existing work or formulae related to this construct.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series convergence and summation techniques
  • Familiarity with matrix algebra and invertibility concepts
  • Knowledge of exponential functions in advanced mathematics
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics as they relate to algebraic structures
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of the reduced exponential in non-invertible contexts
  • Explore applications of reduced exponential in quantum mechanics
  • Study the relationship between reduced exponential and matrix exponentiation
  • Investigate existing literature on generalized exponential functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and researchers interested in advanced algebraic structures, particularly those exploring concepts in quantum mechanics and matrix analysis.

ianbell
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
"Reduced Exponential"

I am interested in what I call the "reduced exponential"
Sum_i=1 to infinity x^(i-1) / i!
where x is a general element in an algebra of interest.

Only when x is invertible is the reduced exponential equivalent to (exp(x)-1) /x .

Obviously we have a "reduced log", the inverse of the reduced exponential.

Does anybody of any work or formulae involving this construct? TIA.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How do you mean: "if x is invertible"?
If x is a number the series is always equal to (exp(x) - 1)/x, unless x= 0 in which case it converges to zero. If not, the notation with the division doesn't make sense.

Where did you encounter this function?
 
"How do you mean: "if x is invertible"?"

x is an element of a general algebra, not merely a real or complex number but a multivector or matrix or similar such object that can be raised to integer powers and summed and so exponentiated. I've encountered this in quantum mechanics ..
 
OK, it is possible to define the exponential in such cases, but then I would write
(\exp(x) - 1) x^{-1} (or x^{-1} (\exp(x) - 1), though I think there is no difference here) instead of the division.
 
Writing x^{-1} instead of dividing by x doesn't help. What if x is not invertible? For example, the matrix
x = \bmatrix 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 \endbmatrix
has no inverse but certainly has a "reduced exponential" as defined in the OP: \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \frac {x^{i-1}}{i!} = \bmatrix 1 & 1/2 \\ 0 & 1 \endbmatrix
 
Last edited:
Doesn't help for what? I was just pointing out a notational inconvenience in
Only when x is invertible is the reduced exponential equivalent to (exp(x)-1) /x .
which still holds, as in the example you gave the sum evaluates to the identity which is not even close to exp(x) - 1 = x.

The question was
Does anybody of any work or formulae involving this construct? TIA.
which I must admit, I can't recall having seen or used anywhere.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
10K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K