Reduction of a simple distributed loading (correct1)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 2K views
Pascal1p
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


View_image_1456412389869.jpg

I am not yet at the chapter of equations of equilibrium, plus it says the couple moment is not 0, so I assume it just about the loadings and not including the reactive forces and reactive moment.

Homework Equations


F= 1/2*b*h
M= 1/2*b*h*d

The Attempt at a Solution


So if I call the top one F1 and the bottom loading F2 I got:

F1+F2=0= -4*b*1/2+2.5*(b+a)*1/2
solving this i got a=0.6b

Moment around the of the bar (not A, but opposite side) due to the loadings is (counter clockwise positive):

M= -F1*center of triangle + F2*center of triangle
Because you can replace the loading with force F1 and force F2 and its line of action is through the center of the triangle area (1/3* base)
M= -8= -4*b*1/2*1/3b+2.5*(b+a)*1/2*1/3*(b+a)

So what am I doing wrong?
Because M can never be negative with me, plus the answer should be b= 5.625 and a= 1.539.
But this to me makes no sense, because then F1+F2 is not 0.
And if I should take the reactive forces into account at A then you can never have still a moment, because then it is not static anymore.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pascal1p said:

Homework Statement


View_image_1456412389869.jpg

I am not yet at the chapter of equations of equilibrium, plus it says the couple moment is not 0, so I assume it just about the loadings and not including the reactive forces and reactive moment.

Homework Equations


F= 1/2*b*h
M= 1/2*b*h*d

The Attempt at a Solution


So if I call the top one F1 and the bottom loading F2 I got:

F1+F2=0= -4*b*1/2+2.5*(b+a)*1/2
solving this i got a=0.6b

I agree with this.
Moment around the of the bar (not A, but opposite side) due to the loadings is (counter clockwise positive):

M= -F1*center of triangle + F2*center of triangle
Because you can replace the loading with force F1 and force F2 and its line of action is through the center of the triangle area (1/3* base)
M= -8= -4*b*1/2*1/3b+2.5*(b+a)*1/2*1/3*(b+a)

So what am I doing wrong?

If your moment convention is negative for CW moments, then you should carry this convention thru your moment calculations.
Because M can never be negative with me, plus the answer should be b= 5.625 and a= 1.539.
But this to me makes no sense, because then F1+F2 is not 0.
And if I should take the reactive forces into account at A then you can never have still a moment, because then it is not static anymore.
The values a = 1.539 and b = 5.625 do not produce a zero net force on the beam with the indicated loadings, so they cannot be correct.

You never said what you calculated for a and b.
 
SteamKing said:
I agree with this.If your moment convention is negative for CW moments, then you should carry this convention thru your moment calculations.

The values a = 1.539 and b = 5.625 do not produce a zero net force on the beam with the indicated loadings, so they cannot be correct.

You never said what you calculated for a and b.
But I did carry it though my moment equations?
M=-8 = - F1*d1 + F2* d2
This is what I did, F1 produces a clockwise moment (thus negative sign) and F2 produces a counterclockwise moment (thus positive).

I did not get a value for a and b, since - F1*d1 + F2* d2 never get below 0 if I use M= -8= -4*b*1/2*1/3b+2.5*(b+a)*1/2*1/3*(b+a)
 
Pascal1p said:
But I did carry it though my moment equations?
M=-8 = - F1*d1 + F2* d2
This is what I did, F1 produces a clockwise moment (thus negative sign) and F2 produces a counterclockwise moment (thus positive).

I did not get a value for a and b, since - F1*d1 + F2* d2 never get below 0 if I use M= -8= -4*b*1/2*1/3b+2.5*(b+a)*1/2*1/3*(b+a)
I don't know how you can say - F1*d1 + F2* d2 never got below zero because you never showed this to be true and you never worked out a value for a or b.
It really doesn't matter, since the values of a and b which are the supposed "solutions" are incorrect.
 
SteamKing said:
I don't know how you can say - F1*d1 + F2* d2 never got below zero because you never showed this to be true and you never worked out a value for a or b.
It really doesn't matter, since the values of a and b which are the supposed "solutions" are incorrect.

well i said a=0.6b, you also found that correct now
M= 4*b*1/2*1/3b+2.5*(b+a)*1/2*1/3*(b+a)
filling in 0.6b=a gives M= -2/3b^2+ 5/12(b+0.6b)^2
which gives M= 0.4b^2
Which can never get below zero. You can graph it or use the D<0 method
 
Pascal1p said:
well i said a=0.6b, you also found that correct now
M= 4*b*1/2*1/3b+2.5*(b+a)*1/2*1/3*(b+a)
filling in 0.6b=a gives M= -2/3b^2+ 5/12(b+0.6b)^2
which gives M= 0.4b^2
Which can never get below zero. You can graph it or use the D<0 method
I took moments about the fixed end of the beam. In that case, the top moment was CCW and the bottom moment was CW. I got a net CW moment, which allowed me to solve for a and b, but these were different values than the ones which were supposed to be the solutions.