Reduction of a simple distributed loading problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the incompatibility of using the NOTE method from exercise 4.21 on exercise 4-156 due to differing location functions. Specifically, the location function in exercise 4.21 is quadratic (x^2), while in exercise 4-156, it is cubic (x^3). This fundamental difference in the mathematical formulation leads to distinct integral results, confirming that the NOTE method cannot be applied interchangeably between these exercises.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus
  • Familiarity with the NOTE method in distributed loading problems
  • Knowledge of quadratic and cubic functions
  • Experience with mathematical modeling of load distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the NOTE method in various loading scenarios
  • Explore integral calculus techniques for different polynomial functions
  • Review examples of distributed loading problems in structural analysis
  • Investigate the implications of varying location functions on load calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in civil engineering, structural analysis, and applied mathematics who are dealing with distributed loading problems and integral calculus.

Renan
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Thread moved from the technical forums, so no Homework Template is shown
1.png

2.png

3.png


Why can't we use the NOTE method (exercise 4.21) on the exercise 4-156 ?

A = ab/3 = (10.500)/3 = 1666,66 N --> this not right
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    65.9 KB · Views: 1,168
  • 2.png
    2.png
    18.1 KB · Views: 1,155
  • 3.png
    3.png
    4.4 KB · Views: 863
Physics news on Phys.org
Renan said:
View attachment 226820
Why can't we use the NOTE method (exercise 4.21) on the exercise 4-156 ?
Because the location function is different. In one case is goes as ##x^2## and in the other as ##x^3##. If you do the integral in each case, you will get a different answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Renan

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K