Reduction of Order to find 2nd solution of DE

  • Thread starter Thread starter zabumafu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reduction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving second-order differential equations using the method of reduction of order. The first problem involves the equation t²y'' - 4ty' + 6y = 0 with a known solution y1(t) = t², leading to the second solution y2(t) = ct³ after applying the reduction method. The second problem, (x-1)y'' - xy' + y = 0 with y1 = e^x, also utilizes reduction of order, transforming the equation into a first-order separable equation. Participants confirm the correctness of the steps taken and discuss the necessity of the Wronskian to establish a fundamental set of solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order linear differential equations
  • Familiarity with the method of reduction of order
  • Knowledge of Wronskian and its role in solution verification
  • Basic integration techniques for solving differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of reduction of order in greater detail
  • Learn about the Wronskian and its application in verifying solution independence
  • Explore first-order separable differential equations and their solutions
  • Practice solving various second-order differential equations using different methods
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on differential equations, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of solution methods for linear differential equations.

zabumafu
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


t^2y''-4ty'+6y=0 t>0, y1(t)=t^2 find the 2nd solution using method of reduction of order.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Let y=v(t)t^2
y'=2tv+v't^2
y''=2v+2tv'+v''t^2+2tv'

put in back into eq and solving reduces to (checked it twice)
t^4*v''=0
v''=0
Then I integrated with respect to T
v'=c (c is some constant)
v(t)=ct where c is a constant.

I substituted v(t) back into y=v(t)*t^2 and got y2=ct^3 where c is some constant so y2=t^3? I know that's the answer but did I correctly do all these steps? Also do I need to show the wronskian in order to prove that the solution is acceptable as y1 and y2 need to form a fundamental set of solutions? Thanks I just want to make sure I am doing this correctly.

--------Problem 2: same question different equation

(x-1)y''-xy'+y=0 x>1 y1=e^x

let y=v(t)e^x
y'=v'e^x +ve^x
y''=v''e^x +2v'e^x +ve^x

into the eq:
e^x[(x-1)(v''+2v'+v)-x(v'+v)+v]=0
(x-1)v''+(x-2)v'=0 then I get confused
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have done problem 1 correctly.

For problem 2, after you have
e^x[(x-1)(v''+2v'+v)-x(v'+v)+v]=0
(x-1)v''+(x-2)v'=0
let u= v' so your differential equation is (x- 1)u'+ (x- 2)u= 0, a differential equation of order 1 (this was, after all, a "reduction of order" method).

That is, in fact, a separable equation- it can be written as (x- 1)u'= (2- x)u and then \frac{du}{u}= \frac{2- x}{x- 1}dx. Integrate both sides.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
1K