Reference for diamagnetic vs paramagnetic

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding a comprehensive table of Fe+2 and Fe+3 compounds in solution, categorized by their magnetic properties (paramagnetic or diamagnetic) based on different ligands. The original poster struggles to locate updated resources, suggesting that traditional chemistry textbooks or the CRC handbook may be limited in their coverage of specific ligands like CO and CN-. It is noted that Fe3+ has an odd number of electrons, leading to unpaired electrons, while most Fe+2 compounds also tend to have unpaired electrons unless specific ligand conditions are met. The importance of understanding d electron spin states and the effects of ligand field geometry on magnetic properties is highlighted. Overall, the search for reliable and detailed information on this topic continues, with a call for better search strategies or resources.
JustinLevy
Messages
882
Reaction score
1
I am not a chemist, so I have a feeling I'm going about searching for the wrong key words or something.

What I want is a table of Fe+2 and Fe+3 compounds in solution (ie. different ligands like CO, CN-, etc.), listing each compound as paramagnetic or diamagnetic. I've searched for a nice chemistry review article that may have this, but this seems too "old" of information so I can't find anything good.

Maybe a good textbook? Or maybe I just don't know how to search for articles well without getting all kinds of noise to sift through.

Please, can anyone help?
Anyone take inorganic chem and can check their textbook, or recommend one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try the CRC handbook
 
Fe3+ has an odd number of electrons, so at least one electron will be unpaired.
 
nbo10 said:
Try the CRC handbook
I looked through the online one which allowed searching. Found some iron compounds under a table for "MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY". I didn't think of looking for that. Maybe with that keyword I can find some more info online, but I'm still struggling to find a huge list. The CRC one was mostly limited to halogen salts. So they didn't even have CO or CN- ligands listed, let alone some common bidentite ones.

PhaseShifter said:
Fe3+ has an odd number of electrons, so at least one electron will be unpaired.
Some ionic complexes have two metallic centers, and so I have been warned that there are cases which are surprisingly diamagnetic. Also, apparently most Fe+2 compounds still have unpaired electrons, unless the ligands are 'just right' or something ... I wish I understood this better. Google books spits out snippets from some chemistry textbooks, so maybe I'll hit up the chemistry library later. But there has got to be some good information on the internet somewhere, if only I knew how to search for it better.
 
JustinLevy said:
Also, apparently most Fe+2 compounds still have unpaired electrons, unless the ligands are 'just right' or something ... I wish I understood this better. Google books spits out snippets from some chemistry textbooks, so maybe I'll hit up the chemistry library later. But there has got to be some good information on the internet somewhere, if only I knew how to search for it better.
d electron spin states

Keep in mind Fe2+ is d6, while F3+ is d5.

also, a tetrahedral ligand field will result in two lower energy orbitals and three higher energy, as opposed to three lower and two higher for octahedral complexes.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K