Reflection and Transmission of String Waves

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the amplitudes of reflected and transmitted waves at the boundary of two wires with different densities. The initial equations derived from boundary conditions led to an expression for the reflected wave's amplitude, which was found to be incorrect due to a sign error. The corrected expressions indicate that the reflected wave's amplitude should be proportional to the incident wave's amplitude, considering the densities of the two media. Additionally, the inversion of the reflected wave is contingent on the signs of the amplitudes of the incident and reflected waves. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying wave equations to determine relationships between the amplitudes.
Ark236
Messages
24
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Suppose that two wire have different densities and are joined at x = 0. Determine the amplitude of the transmitted and reflected wave at x = 0
Relevant Equations
y_i = A_i sin(k1 x - wt)
y_r = A_r sin(k1 x +wt)
y_t = A_r sin(k2 x - wt)
To obtain the amplitude of the reflected and transmitted wave, I consider that the initial pulse is traveling to the right and I use the boundaries condition:

1. y_i(x = 0) + y_r(x = 0) = y_r(x = 0)
2. dy_i/dx |_(x = 0) + dy_r/dx |_(x = 0) = dy_r/dx |_(x = 0)

The expression for the incident, reflected and transmitted wave are:

y_i = A_i sin(k1x - wt) wave traveling to the right.
y_r = A_r sin(k1x + wt) wave traveling to the left.
y_t = A_r sin(k2x - wt) wave traveling to the right.


The first equation lead to y_i - y_r = y_t and the second equation lead to y_i k1 + y_r k1 = y_t k2. When I solve the system of equation I find that the amplitude of the reflected wave is:

y_r = (k2-k1)/(k1+k2)

which can be express in terms of the linear mass density mu of each medium using that k2 = k1 sqrt(mu2/mu1):

y_r = (mu2-mu1)/(mu1+mu2)

This result is wrong because if mu2>mu1 the reflected wave would be inverted with respect to the incident. There is a minus sign in some place.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ark236 said:
Homework Statement: Suppose that two wire have different densities and are joined at x = 0. Determine the amplitude of the transmitted and reflected wave at x = 0
Relevant Equations: y_i = A_i sin(k1 x - wt)
y_r = A_r sin(k1 x +wt)
y_t = A_r sin(k2 x - wt)

To obtain the amplitude of the reflected and transmitted wave, I consider that the initial pulse is traveling to the right and I use the boundaries condition:

1. y_i(x = 0) + y_r(x = 0) = y_r(x = 0)
2. dy_i/dx |_(x = 0) + dy_r/dx |_(x = 0) = dy_r/dx |_(x = 0)

The expression for the incident, reflected and transmitted wave are:

y_i = A_i sin(k1x - wt) wave traveling to the right.
y_r = A_r sin(k1x + wt) wave traveling to the left.
y_t = A_r sin(k2x - wt) wave traveling to the right.


The first equation lead to y_i - y_r = y_t and the second equation lead to y_i k1 + y_r k1 = y_t k2. When I solve the system of equation I find that the amplitude of the reflected wave is:

y_r = (k2-k1)/(k1+k2)

which can be express in terms of the linear mass density mu of each medium using that k2 = k1 sqrt(mu2/mu1):

y_r = (mu2-mu1)/(mu1+mu2)

This result is wrong because if mu2>mu1 the reflected wave would be inverted with respect to the incident. There is a minus sign in some place.

thanks
If A_t is the amplitude of the transmitted wave then
y_t = A_r sin(k2x - wt) should be
y_t = A_t sin(k2x - wt).

Edit. Also "y_r = (mu2-mu1)/(mu1+mu2)" can not be correct as it is inhomogeneous. The left side has the dimension of length but the right side is dimensionless.
 
Last edited:
thanks, I made a mistake when copying the calculation. y_r = (mu2-mu1)/(mu1+mu2)y_i and y_t = A_t sin(k2 x - wt). However, if mu2>mu1 i expect that y_r will negative since the reflected wave is inverted.
 
You wrote the incident and reflected waves as $$y_i = A_i \sin(k_1x - \omega t)$$ $$y_r = A_r \sin(k_1x+ \omega t)$$ Consider ##x = 0## for these two equations. If ##A_i## and ##A_r## are both positive, is the reflected wave inverted relative to the incident wave or not inverted?

Some books write the waves as ##y = A \sin(wt \pm kx)## with the ##\omega t## coming first in the argument of the sine function. In this case consider the incident and reflected waves written as $$y_i = A_i \sin(\omega t -k_1x )$$ $$y_r = A_r \sin(\omega t+k_1x )$$ Now is the reflected wave inverted if both ##A_i## and ##A_r## are positive?
 
I deleted my reply as I decided it was confusing.
 
Last edited:
Ark236 said:
1. y_i(x = 0) + y_r(x = 0) = y_t(x = 0)
2. dy_i/dx |_(x = 0) + dy_r/dx |_(x = 0) = dy_t/dx |_(x = 0)
These equations are to hold at all instants of time.

Ark236 said:
The first equation lead to y_i - y_r = y_t and the second equation lead to y_i k1 + y_r k1 = y_t k2.
You should be looking for equations relating ##A_i##, ##A_r##, and ##A_t##. You need to solve for ##A_r## and ##A_t## in terms of ##A_i##.
 
Thanks, when I use $y_i = A_i sin(\omega t - k_1 x )$ and $y_r = A_r \sin(\omega t) + k_1x)$ the calculations work. However, it is not clear to me why it does not work in the other case.
 
Ark236 said:
Thanks, when I use $y_i = A_i sin(\omega t - k_1 x )$ and $y_r = A_r \sin(\omega t) + k_1x)$ the calculations work. However, it is not clear to me why it does not work in the other case.
In the case where you are using ##y = A\sin(kx \pm\omega t)##, show that the reflected wave is inverted if ##A_r## and ##A_i## have the same sign. See the first paragraph of post #4.

If you use ##y = A\sin(\omega t \pm kx)##, show that the reflected wave is inverted if ##A_r## and ##A_i## have opposite sign.

It might help to note that ##\sin(\omega t - kx) = -\sin(kx - \omega t)##, but ##\sin(\omega t + kx) = +\sin(kx + \omega t)##
 
Thank you very much :D.
 
Back
Top