Reflection and Transmission of String Waves

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the reflection and transmission of waves on strings with different linear mass densities. Participants are analyzing the boundary conditions at the junction of two strings and attempting to determine the amplitudes of the reflected and transmitted waves.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the boundary conditions for wave equations and discussing the implications of different mass densities on wave behavior. There is a focus on the mathematical relationships between the amplitudes of incident, reflected, and transmitted waves.

Discussion Status

Some participants have identified potential errors in their calculations and are questioning the conditions under which the reflected wave is inverted. There is ongoing exploration of the correct formulation of wave equations and the relationships between their amplitudes.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the equations must hold at all times and are considering the implications of using different forms of the wave equations. There is mention of dimensional consistency in the expressions derived for the amplitudes.

Ark236
Messages
24
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Suppose that two wire have different densities and are joined at x = 0. Determine the amplitude of the transmitted and reflected wave at x = 0
Relevant Equations
y_i = A_i sin(k1 x - wt)
y_r = A_r sin(k1 x +wt)
y_t = A_r sin(k2 x - wt)
To obtain the amplitude of the reflected and transmitted wave, I consider that the initial pulse is traveling to the right and I use the boundaries condition:

1. y_i(x = 0) + y_r(x = 0) = y_r(x = 0)
2. dy_i/dx |_(x = 0) + dy_r/dx |_(x = 0) = dy_r/dx |_(x = 0)

The expression for the incident, reflected and transmitted wave are:

y_i = A_i sin(k1x - wt) wave traveling to the right.
y_r = A_r sin(k1x + wt) wave traveling to the left.
y_t = A_r sin(k2x - wt) wave traveling to the right.


The first equation lead to y_i - y_r = y_t and the second equation lead to y_i k1 + y_r k1 = y_t k2. When I solve the system of equation I find that the amplitude of the reflected wave is:

y_r = (k2-k1)/(k1+k2)

which can be express in terms of the linear mass density mu of each medium using that k2 = k1 sqrt(mu2/mu1):

y_r = (mu2-mu1)/(mu1+mu2)

This result is wrong because if mu2>mu1 the reflected wave would be inverted with respect to the incident. There is a minus sign in some place.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ark236 said:
Homework Statement: Suppose that two wire have different densities and are joined at x = 0. Determine the amplitude of the transmitted and reflected wave at x = 0
Relevant Equations: y_i = A_i sin(k1 x - wt)
y_r = A_r sin(k1 x +wt)
y_t = A_r sin(k2 x - wt)

To obtain the amplitude of the reflected and transmitted wave, I consider that the initial pulse is traveling to the right and I use the boundaries condition:

1. y_i(x = 0) + y_r(x = 0) = y_r(x = 0)
2. dy_i/dx |_(x = 0) + dy_r/dx |_(x = 0) = dy_r/dx |_(x = 0)

The expression for the incident, reflected and transmitted wave are:

y_i = A_i sin(k1x - wt) wave traveling to the right.
y_r = A_r sin(k1x + wt) wave traveling to the left.
y_t = A_r sin(k2x - wt) wave traveling to the right.


The first equation lead to y_i - y_r = y_t and the second equation lead to y_i k1 + y_r k1 = y_t k2. When I solve the system of equation I find that the amplitude of the reflected wave is:

y_r = (k2-k1)/(k1+k2)

which can be express in terms of the linear mass density mu of each medium using that k2 = k1 sqrt(mu2/mu1):

y_r = (mu2-mu1)/(mu1+mu2)

This result is wrong because if mu2>mu1 the reflected wave would be inverted with respect to the incident. There is a minus sign in some place.

thanks
If A_t is the amplitude of the transmitted wave then
y_t = A_r sin(k2x - wt) should be
y_t = A_t sin(k2x - wt).

Edit. Also "y_r = (mu2-mu1)/(mu1+mu2)" can not be correct as it is inhomogeneous. The left side has the dimension of length but the right side is dimensionless.
 
Last edited:
thanks, I made a mistake when copying the calculation. y_r = (mu2-mu1)/(mu1+mu2)y_i and y_t = A_t sin(k2 x - wt). However, if mu2>mu1 i expect that y_r will negative since the reflected wave is inverted.
 
You wrote the incident and reflected waves as $$y_i = A_i \sin(k_1x - \omega t)$$ $$y_r = A_r \sin(k_1x+ \omega t)$$ Consider ##x = 0## for these two equations. If ##A_i## and ##A_r## are both positive, is the reflected wave inverted relative to the incident wave or not inverted?

Some books write the waves as ##y = A \sin(wt \pm kx)## with the ##\omega t## coming first in the argument of the sine function. In this case consider the incident and reflected waves written as $$y_i = A_i \sin(\omega t -k_1x )$$ $$y_r = A_r \sin(\omega t+k_1x )$$ Now is the reflected wave inverted if both ##A_i## and ##A_r## are positive?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vela
I deleted my reply as I decided it was confusing.
 
Last edited:
Ark236 said:
1. y_i(x = 0) + y_r(x = 0) = y_t(x = 0)
2. dy_i/dx |_(x = 0) + dy_r/dx |_(x = 0) = dy_t/dx |_(x = 0)
These equations are to hold at all instants of time.

Ark236 said:
The first equation lead to y_i - y_r = y_t and the second equation lead to y_i k1 + y_r k1 = y_t k2.
You should be looking for equations relating ##A_i##, ##A_r##, and ##A_t##. You need to solve for ##A_r## and ##A_t## in terms of ##A_i##.
 
Thanks, when I use $y_i = A_i sin(\omega t - k_1 x )$ and $y_r = A_r \sin(\omega t) + k_1x)$ the calculations work. However, it is not clear to me why it does not work in the other case.
 
Ark236 said:
Thanks, when I use $y_i = A_i sin(\omega t - k_1 x )$ and $y_r = A_r \sin(\omega t) + k_1x)$ the calculations work. However, it is not clear to me why it does not work in the other case.
In the case where you are using ##y = A\sin(kx \pm\omega t)##, show that the reflected wave is inverted if ##A_r## and ##A_i## have the same sign. See the first paragraph of post #4.

If you use ##y = A\sin(\omega t \pm kx)##, show that the reflected wave is inverted if ##A_r## and ##A_i## have opposite sign.

It might help to note that ##\sin(\omega t - kx) = -\sin(kx - \omega t)##, but ##\sin(\omega t + kx) = +\sin(kx + \omega t)##
 
Thank you very much :D.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K