Reflection coefficient of the step function potential

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the reflection coefficient for a step function potential where the energy E is less than the potential V0. Participants emphasize the need to solve the wave equation in two regions and match the wavefunction and its derivative at the boundary to find the reflection coefficient. There is some confusion regarding the nature of the wavefunctions, particularly whether they need to be complex. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that the reflection coefficient can still be determined despite the wavefunctions being real in certain regions. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding quantum tunneling in this context.
kakarotyjn
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the step function potential: V(x) = \{ \begin{array}{*{20}c}<br /> {0,(x \le 0)} \\<br /> {V_0 ,(x &gt; 0)} \\<br /> \end{array},Caculate the reflection coefficient,for the case E<V0,and comment on the answer


Homework Equations


- \frac{{\hbar ^2 }}{{2m}}\frac{{d^2 \psi }}{{dx^2 }} + V_0 \psi = E\psi


The Attempt at a Solution


when x<=0,let k = \frac{{\sqrt {2mE} }}{\hbar },then \psi (x) = Ae^{kxi} + Be^{ - kxi},if x>0,then let l = \frac{{\sqrt {2m(V_0 - E)} }}{\hbar },and \psi (x) = De^{ - lx}


Then how do we explain it?The funtion is real in the right
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
So far, all you've done is written down the solutions to the wave equation in two regions. What's the next step? What's the definition of the reflection coefficient?
 
In the book,if psi(x) is not real in the right and left,then we can find the transmission and reflection coefficient.But in this question,it's not all complex.

definition of the reflection coefficient?You must know Quantum Tunneliing.it that one
 
I know what the reflection coefficient is. It's not clear to me that you did from your initial post.

It doesn't matter if all the solutions are not complex. The next step is the same: match the wavefunction and its derivative at the boundary.
 
Thanks very much.But why?how should we think about it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K