Why Does the Body Reject Generally Healthy Substances?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dekoi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the phenomenon of the human body rejecting certain substances that are generally considered healthy due to their foreign nature. A key example highlighted is beta-lactam antibiotics, particularly penicillin, which many individuals are allergic to despite their effectiveness in treating serious bacterial infections. This raises questions about the body's immune response to foreign substances and the prevalence of such reactions in the context of medical treatments. The conversation suggests that while these reactions may not be common, they are significant in understanding allergies and the body's defense mechanisms.
dekoi
Is it common to see a human body rejecting a specific substance only because it is foreign to it -- while at the same time, being generally healthy for the human body?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
Common?...I'm not sure, but beta-lactam antibiotics in the context of a serious bacterial infection might qualify, as there are so many people allergic to penicillin.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top