Relating linear and angular kinematics

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics assignment related to linear and angular kinematics involving a wheel with a radius of 0.200 m. At t=3.00s, the wheel has a tangential speed of 50.0 m/s, leading to an angular velocity of 250 rad/s at that time. The wheel's angular acceleration is calculated to be -50 rad/s², indicating it is slowing down. The total angle turned by the wheel between t=0 and t=3.00s is determined to be 975 radians. Additionally, the conditions for radial acceleration equating to gravitational acceleration (g) are discussed, emphasizing the relationship between linear and angular motion.
kenren
im really having a hard tym doing this assignment of mine, i hope someone cud help me out on this one.

at t= 3.00s a point on the rim of a 0.200-m-radius wheel has a tangential speed of 50.0 m/s as the whell slows down with a tangential acceleration of constant magnitude 10.0 m/s2.
a.)Calculate the wheel's constant angular acceleration.
b.) calculate the wheel's constant angular velocities at t= 3.00s and t= 0.
c.) through what angle did the wheel turn between t=0 and t=3.00s?
At what time will the radial acceleration equal g?


can you tell me the formula and the process on how to solve this problems..please.. I've tried to solve this one but just couldn't get any good answers. please neone help me...:frown:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
An entire circle is 2pi radians and the circumference of a circle of radius 0.2 m is .4 pi m. That means that an angular velocity of omega radians/s is the same as (1/(2pi)omega) revolutions per second or (.4pi)(1/(2pi))omega = .2 omega m/s tangential speed. Since you are given that, at t=3, the tangential speed is 50 m/s, it follow that the angular velocity at that time satisfies 50= .2 omega or
omega= 50/.2= 250 radians/s. (That's part of the answer to part b.)

If the wheel was slowing down at a constant 10 m/s^2, then, when t=0, the tangential speed must have been 50+ 3(10)= 80 m/s^2. By the same argument, the angular velocity at that time was 80/.2=
400 radian/s. (That's the rest of the answer to part b.)

Since the angular velocity changed from 400 radians/s to 250 radians/s in 3 seconds, the angular acceleration is (250-400)/3=
-150/3= -50 radians/s^2. (That's the answer to part a.)

For a constant angular acceleration of -50 m/s and angular velocity at t=0 of 400 radians/sec, the angular velocity after t seconds is 400- 50t radians/sec. The "position" (in the sense of angles) is the integral of that 400t- 25t^2 (assuming 0 as the initial "angle") so in 3 seconds, the wheel will have turned through an angle of 400(3)- 25(3^2)= 1200- 25(9)= 1200- 225= 975 radians. (That's the answer to part c.)

If you don't want to use calculus (the "integral") you can use an "averaging method". At t=0, the angular velocity is 400 radians/s and at t= 3, the angular velocity is 250 radians/sec. The average angular velocity is (400+ 250)/2= 650/2= 325 radians/sec (averaging using only the first and last values works ONLY when the rate of change (here acceleration) is constant). Moving at 325 radians/s for 3 sec means the wheel moves through 325*3= 975 radians as above. (Of course, proving that, for constant acceleration, we can average like that, requires calculus!)

The radial acceleration of a wheel with radius R and angular velocity of omega is R omega^2. That will be equal to g when, of course, R omega^2= g. Here, R= 0.2, g= 9.8, and omega= 400- 50t so you need to solve 0.2(400-50t)^2= 9.8 to answer the last question.
 


Linear and angular kinematics are two ways of describing the motion of an object. Linear kinematics deals with the motion of an object in a straight line, while angular kinematics deals with the motion of an object in a circular path. These two types of motion are related through the concept of radius and angular displacement.

To relate linear and angular kinematics, we can use the formula v = rω, where v is the linear velocity, r is the radius, and ω is the angular velocity. This formula shows that the linear velocity of a point on the rim of a wheel is directly proportional to its distance from the center of the wheel (radius) and its angular velocity.

Now, let's apply this concept to the given problem. At t=3.00s, the point on the rim of the wheel has a tangential speed of 50.0 m/s and a radius of 0.200m. Using the formula v = rω, we can solve for the angular velocity at t=3.00s:

50.0 m/s = (0.200m)ω

ω = 50.0 m/s / (0.200m)

ω = 250 rad/s

a.) To calculate the wheel's constant angular acceleration, we can use the formula ω = ω0 + αt, where ω0 is the initial angular velocity, α is the angular acceleration, and t is the time. Since we know the initial angular velocity at t=0 is 0 rad/s, we can solve for α:

250 rad/s = 0 rad/s + α(3.00s)

α = 250 rad/s / 3.00s

α = 83.3 rad/s^2

b.) To calculate the wheel's constant angular velocity at t=3.00s, we already solved for it in part a. At t=0, the angular velocity is 0 rad/s.

c.) To find the angle through which the wheel turned between t=0 and t=3.00s, we can use the formula θ = θ0 + ω0t + 1/2αt^2, where θ0 is the initial angular displacement, ω0 is the initial angular velocity, α is the angular acceleration, and t is the time. Since θ0 = 0 and ω0 = 0, we can solve for θ
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
852
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K