Relation between inequalities for first and second derivatives

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the first and second derivatives of functions, specifically questioning whether the inequality f'(x) >= f'(y) implies f''(x) >= f''(y). It is established that this inference cannot be made universally, with counterexamples provided, such as F(x) = x² and G(x) = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000x. The conditions under which the inequality holds are dependent on specific bounds and the nature of the functions involved, particularly when considering functions like sine and cosine that exhibit periodic behavior. The conversation also touches on Taylor series, emphasizing that having the same linear coefficient does not guarantee the same quadratic coefficient.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of first and second derivatives in calculus
  • Familiarity with Taylor series and their coefficients
  • Knowledge of periodic functions, specifically sine and cosine
  • Concept of convexity and concavity in graphical analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Taylor series on function behavior
  • Explore the properties of convex and concave functions
  • Investigate counterexamples in calculus to understand derivative relationships
  • Learn about the conditions under which inequalities for derivatives hold
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and anyone interested in the behavior of functions and their derivatives, particularly in the context of inequalities and Taylor series.

nikozm
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hi,

If f'(x) >= f'(y) can we say that f''(x) >= f''(y) also holds ? And if yes under which conditions ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, no such inference can be generally drawn.
 
A simple counter example is
F(x)= x ^2
G(x)= 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 x
DF = 2x
DG= 1,000,000,000,000,000,000
D^2F = 2
D^2G= 0
For x > 500,000,000,000,000,000
nikozm said:
Hi,

If f'(x) >= f'(y) can we say that f''(x) >= f''(y) also holds ? And if yes under which conditions ?

Thanks
is not correct. For anything below those bounds it is right. The inequality you stated is only true under certain bounds because the two derivatives vary and may periodically become greater or smaller as in the sine and cosine functions. Bounds the inequality is true under need to be specified , to answer questions about the examples of the inequality you stated. Also because the derivative is a function it varies inequalities can't though and become false for certain values of the function. (The sine cosine remark serves as a good example, but I'm leaning towards arbitrary functions varying in all different manners not just varying periodically.)
 
do you know about taylor series? In that series representation of a function, the first derivative is the linear coefficient and the second derive active is (twice) the quadratic coefficient. Your question is thus sort of like asking whether two taylor writes which have the same linear coefficient must also have the same quadratic coefficient. Of course not, as the second coefficient can be anything.

Or geometrically, the first derivative measures the slope of the graph while the second derivative measures the convexity. so this is like asking whether two graphs with the same slope must also have the same convexity, or concavity at a point. can you draw a counterexample?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K