Relation between Serghides friction factor and Moody diagram

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on using Serghides' friction factor method to create a Moody diagram for fluid modeling. Participants confirm that Excel can effectively plot the diagram by organizing Reynolds numbers in rows and relative roughness in columns. The recommended ranges for Reynolds numbers are from 2 x 103 to 1 x 108 and for relative roughness from 1 x 10-6 to 5 x 10-2. This approach provides a visual representation to validate the accuracy of the Serghides equation compared to the Colebrook equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Serghides' friction factor method
  • Familiarity with the Moody diagram concept
  • Proficiency in Microsoft Excel for data manipulation and plotting
  • Knowledge of Reynolds number and relative roughness in fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to implement the Colebrook equation in Excel for comparison
  • Learn advanced Excel techniques for data visualization
  • Explore MATLAB for more complex fluid modeling tasks
  • Investigate the implications of different relative roughness values on friction factor calculations
USEFUL FOR

Fluid dynamics engineers, mechanical engineers, and anyone involved in fluid modeling and analysis will benefit from this discussion, particularly those looking to validate friction factor calculations using Serghides' method.

jp8weaver
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi All,
I'm working on some fluid modeling, and I'm calculating my friction factor using Serghides' method, which, I'm sure you all know, is very accurate in relation to the Colebrook equation. The trouble is, I need to convince my boss that the Serghides equation has merit and is that accurate. When we were talking about it, he said to make a Moody diagram using Serghides' equation to prove to him that the lines were correct. I've got relatively limited software, just Excel right now, and I'm sure that I could plot a diagram as a function of relative roughness and Reynolds number that would yield the friction factor, but it looks to me like it needs to be in terms of f and Re yielding the relative roughness. Is that the case, and is there a method that I could use within Excel to plot the Moody diagram, or would I need something like MatLAB? Thanks.

Nevermind. Got it.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm trying to do the exact same... how did you "get it" with Excel?
 
desiree74 said:
I'm trying to do the exact same... how did you "get it" with Excel?

What I did was basically setting up a table with the Reynolds numbers in rows and the relative roughness numbers in columns. Go to the first column in your data sheet, then go down one cell and write your first Reynolds number and continue going down the column writing your range of Re. Then, go to the first cell in the second column and write your first relative roughness number and compute the friction factors in the rest of the cells in the second column. Move to the next column, write your second relative roughness number, compute friction factors, and so on until you have used your range of relative roughness numbers. I used ranges of Re from 2 x 10^3 to 1 x 10^8 and relative roughness from 1 x 10^-6 to 5 x 10^-2. By taking relatively small steps after each increase in decimal place in the Re numbers, the curve looks a little more smooth. Good luck!

James
 
Thanks, James! I'll get right on it.

cheers,

Desirée
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
17K