What is the most accurate explicit solution for the Colebrook equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tglester
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explicit
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 6K views
tglester
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I authored the articles, http//www.cheresources.com/colebrook1.shtml with parts 2 and 3 in 2004. I'm requesting assistance in updating the explicit equations portions of that series. My problem is that I have been unable to verify the accuracy of the Goudar - Sonnad equation. I have attempted to enter the equations in an Excel spreadsheet but the results are not to the stated accuracy.
Specifically, I have tried to test Goudar against Serghide at the point of maximum error in Serghide, which is at Rel Roughness of 0 and Reynolds Number of 171,000. As I have entered the formulas, I get a result from Goudar of f = .0162416. An iterative solution would yield f = .0161281. Back substitution of these results into the original Colebrook equation would suggest that the iterative solution is more accurate.
I'd appreciate any comments or assistance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi tglester, welcome to the board. How close is the Colebrook equation to the Moody diagram? I don't think they match exactly. I've always assumed the Moody diagram was the basis for the equations that are created, but I'm not sure. Do you know?

There's another reference http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=1236" that you may find interesting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Q_Goest said:
Hi tglester, welcome to the board. How close is the Colebrook equation to the Moody diagram? I don't think they match exactly. I've always assumed the Moody diagram was the basis for the equations that are created, but I'm not sure. Do you know?

There's another reference http://www.eng-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=1236" that you may find interesting.
The Colebrook equation came first, 1937 I believe. The Moody diagram (1944) is a graphic representation of the Colebrook equation and is as accurate as you can read it; which may be a problem depending on the accuracy you seek.
Explicit forms of Colebrook are generally "curve fits" to the original implicit forms of Colebrook. Iterative solutions to Colebrook are just that. I developed User Defined Functions (UDF's) that are iterative's which can be used in Excel spreadsheets. While the need for accuracy can be questioned, the the UDF's I developed are accurate to six significant digits.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The problem with Goudar-Sonnad has been solved. I had a version of Goudar-Sonnad that gave the d parameter as: d=ln(10) x Re/5.2. I believe the source was Wikipedia which now correctly lists this as: d=ln(10) x Re/5.02. With this corrected equation, I have verified that Goudar-Sonnad is the most accurate of all the explicit forms that I have evaluated.