Relationship between radial distance and charge density of a capacitor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between surface charge density and radial distance in a capacitor experiment. Data collected from a capacitor with two circular plates, set 5 cm apart and powered by a 1000V supply, indicates that surface charge density decreases as radial distance from the center increases. The experiment utilized a proof plate to measure charge density and a Faraday Ice pail with an electrometer for accurate readings. The findings challenge the assumption of constant surface charge density, revealing that charge distribution varies across the plate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of capacitor theory and design
  • Familiarity with surface charge density concepts
  • Knowledge of electrometer operation and measurement techniques
  • Experience with experimental data collection and analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical relationship between charge density and radial distance in capacitors
  • Explore the principles of electrostatics and charge distribution in conductors
  • Learn about the operation and calibration of Faraday Ice pails
  • Investigate the effects of voltage variations on charge density measurements
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone conducting experiments related to capacitance and charge distribution in capacitors.

Tony Hau
Messages
107
Reaction score
30
Homework Statement
Plot voltage(proportional to the charge density) versus the radial distance r. How does the charge density vary with position? Explain your result.
Relevant Equations
Q=CV
So this is a question from my lab report on capacitance.

The aim of the experiment is to find out the relationship between surface charge density and radial distance from the centre of the plate capacitor. And in this experiment I have recorded 5 sets of data, namely r=0, V=4, r=1, V=3.5, r=2, V=3, r=3, V=2, r=4, V=2.5. The error of voltage is plus or minus 0.5V.
The steps involved are as follows:
Firstly we set two circular plates coated with metals to 5 cm apart. Then we connect the a 1000V power supply across the capactior.

Secondly, we use a proof plate to measure the charge in different radial distance from the centre one of the circular plate. The radial distances are as above listed.

The function of the proof plate is that it can acquire the same amount of charge as the section of the touched surface and so you can dertermine the charge density of the sample surface.

Finally, we measure the charge on proof plate by using a Faraday Ice pail with an electrometer, as shown in this picture.
1594132301248.png


What I do not understance is why the surface charge density will actually vary with the radial distance from the centre of the plate. I have been always told to assume constant surface charge density. And from my data, it seems that the surface charge density decreases as the radial distance increases.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am interested in your experiment. Could you tell me how much percentage charge density decreases from the center to the periphery ?
 
An electrometer does not directly measure the local charge density; it measures the local potential. The measurement is affected by the charge distribution over the whole plate.

Consider an isolated charged conducting disc. The charge will clearly be concentrated towards the periphery, but the potential constant. If we pick up a copy of that onto an insulating proof disc the same will apply.

With a capacitor, the charge will be much more evenly distributed, and this will be copied to the proof disc. So now the proof disc has more charge in the centre than before, and hence, once removed from the capacitor, a higher potential than at the periphery.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K