Relative dielectric constant - More than one dielectric in a capacitor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor filled with two different dielectrics: mica (k1=5) and paraffin (k2=2). The capacitance (C) is derived using the formula k=(2k1k2)/(k1+k2) for dielectrics in series. The voltage drop across each dielectric is calculated separately, leading to the total voltage drop across the capacitor. The participants clarify that when dielectrics are arranged in series, the effective dielectric constant is computed differently than when they are in parallel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parallel plate capacitor theory
  • Knowledge of dielectric constants and their significance
  • Familiarity with voltage drop calculations in capacitors
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of capacitance formulas for capacitors with multiple dielectrics
  • Learn about the differences between series and parallel capacitor configurations
  • Explore the impact of dielectric materials on capacitor performance
  • Investigate practical applications of capacitors with multiple dielectrics in electronic circuits
USEFUL FOR

Students in electrical engineering, physics enthusiasts, and professionals working with capacitors in circuit design will benefit from this discussion.

Gabry89
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A parallel plane capacitor with conducting plates area \Sigma= 400cm2, distant d=5mm, is half filled of mica (k1=5) and half filled of paraffin (k2=2). Calculate:

a) C (Capacitance of the capacitor)

...others

Homework Equations



None

The Attempt at a Solution



I haven't got too many problems solving this exercise but i just don't know how to get to the correct result of k (relative dielectric constant) when there's more than one dielectric in a parallel plate capacitor.

Esn436pag104.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calculate the voltage drop across the two dielectrics separately. Their sum will equal the voltage drop across the capacitor.
 
Ok, then:

V=(E*d)/k ; V1=(E*(d/2))/k1; V2=(E*(d/2))/k2;

V=V1+V2;

(E*d)/k=((E*d)*(k1+k2))/(2k1k2)

k=(2k1k2)/(k1+k2)

this should be correct thanks.

-------------------------------------------------------

Another question: if i would have had a capacitor like this:

Esn435pag104.jpg


i can't find k like i did before 'cause k would be like (k1*k2)/k1+k2 while it should be like
(k1+k2)/2
 
Last edited:
You can think of it as two capacitors in parallel.
 
ok, thanks i got it now, the sum of the capacitances of the two capacitors (cause they are in parallel) gives me the total capacitance.

So, in the first exercise I've asked you, the capacitors can be considered as connected in series?
 
Yes, effectively it's two capacitors in series.
 
vela said:
Yes, effectively it's two capacitors in series.

ok, thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
772
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
4K